The car was launched on 26 March 1975 as the 18–22 series, "the car that has got it all together". The number designation 18–22 referred to the engine sizes available carried forward from the 1800 cc
BMC B-series and 2200 cc
E-series-engined
BMC ADO 17 "Landcrab". For the first six months of production three badge-engineered versions were produced:
Austin,
Morris and
Wolseley. The Austin model bore the original "design intent", featuring trapezoidal headlights and a simple horizontally vaned grille with added "Austin" script to the lower right side. The Morris and Wolseley cars bonnets had a raised "hump" permitting a larger, styled grille for each model; the Morris one was a simple chrome rectangle with "Morris" script in the lower right-hand corner, while Wolseleys had a chrome grille with the traditional illuminated Wolseley badge in the middle, with narrower vertical bars either side set back within the chromed surround. Both of these versions had four round headlights, and the Wolseley model was only available with the six-cylinder engine and luxury
velour trim. Apart from their bonnet and headlamp designs, and of course their badging, the Austin and Morris models were virtually identical.
Models Styling The exterior styling was distinctive, innovative, and somewhat divisive. "The Wedge", as it was often nicknamed, was indeed very wedge-shaped; the styling was all angles and slanting panels. This was very much a 1970s design as created by Italian stylists (see
Lamborghini Countach for example). Within BL the car was often referred to as "The Anteater". The designer,
Harris Mann, was also responsible for the
Triumph TR7, another wedge-shaped car, as was his original design for the
Austin Allegro, although by the time that design had been readied for production nearly all the angular styling features had been lost. The Princess, unlike the Allegro, made it to regular production relatively unscathed and unaltered from Mann's original plan. The bonnet (hood) was a little higher, to allow for taller engines, but the biggest change from Mann's design involved the rear. Man had intended the design to be a five-door
hatchback, but management decided that the
Austin Maxi should be the only hatchback in the range, making that its unique selling point, and besides, they thought the Princess's prospective buyers would dislike a hatchback – despite the fact that in the Rover division the larger
Rover SD1 was being given a hatchback design. Consequently, the Princess received fixed rear glass and a separate boot, belying its appearance. An estate version was also proposed, but never reached production.
Mechanical details The base engine fitted was the 1798 cc
B-series pushrod straight-4. The lay-out closely followed that of the
predecessor model, but access to the
alternator/water pump was greatly improved by exploiting the car's longer nose to fit a front-mounted radiator. The basic design of the engine dated back to 1947 and the unit with a claimed output of 84 bhp was notably lacking in power, although torque was reasonable. The larger engine, fitted to upper models in the range, was a 2227 cc
E-series SOHC straight-6. This was very smooth and a much more modern engine, with a published output figure of 110 bhp, but was still not hugely powerful. The Princess was a big car, and the engine choice gave lacklustre performance, not helped by the provision of only a 4-speed manual gearbox (a
Borg-Warner automatic transmission was an option). Suspension used BL's
Hydragas system.
Performance and price comparison A six-cylinder car was road tested by Britain's
Autocar magazine in March 1975 at the time of the model's launch. It recorded a maximum speed of 104 mph (167 km/h) and reached 60 mph (97 km/h) from a standing start in 13.5 seconds. The top speed was marginally lower than the 109 mph (175 km/h) achieved by a recently tested
Ford Consul 2500 L and a full three seconds slower to 60 mph than the Ford which managed the standing start test in just 10.4 seconds. The 2200 also fell slightly behind the
Fiat 132GLS 1800 in these comparisons. At the same time its overall fuel consumption at 20.7 mpg was usefully superior to the Ford's 18.1 mpg. The lighter Fiat was more frugal with fuel than either of the other two. On price, the Austin's domestic market recommended retail prices including taxes of £2,424 was significantly higher than the £2,221 charged for the Ford. Although its performance figures on paper were a little underwhelming, the testers were impressed with the roominess and roadholding of the Austin 2200. They found it quiet and comfortable, the driving position in particular representing a vast improvement over the car's
predecessor. They mentioned in passing that the boot/trunk on the test car "leaked slightly", but did not labour the point. The Princess was similar in size to the
Ford Cortina, and was marketed by British Leyland as a rival to the larger engined versions of the Cortina, as well as smaller engined versions of the
Ford Granada. == Princess ==