The book received mixed reviews from critics, frequently drawing comparisons to
Lenny Bruce's 1965 autobiography
How to Talk Dirty and Influence People. Like Stern's radio show, it received a great deal of opposition due to its content. It is number 86 on the
American Library Association's list of the "100 Most Frequently
challenged books Between 1990 and 1999." A paperback edition was released in September 1994, where
Pocket Books, a division of Simon & Schuster, printed a further 2.8 million copies. In late 1995, Stern published a second book called
Miss America. Stern's venture into literature drew much of the same criticism as his radio show. While
Private Parts received some positive comparisons to Bruce's book, it was also characterized as nothing more than an extension of his radio show with little more to offer. Stern was praised for his
populist message and attracting a group of people who normally do not read either by choice or for lack of ability. Another frequent criticism was that the material was juvenile, with little more to offer than stories of "breasts, behinds, penises, masturbation, defecation, and the expulsion of gas". in some instances the comparison was favorable, citing Stern's as the best book by a comedian since Bruce's. Others felt Stern fell short of the mark, or at least not influencing people as suggested by his ratings in certain
radio markets. As the host of a highly rated radio show, the comparison between the book and his radio show was inevitable. The radio show was often the starting point from which the reviewer based their opinion of the book. Sometimes the praise for the book came in spite of the critic's distaste for the show, Critics would sometimes qualify that they could not adequately relay the stories because of their papers' editorial standards.
Margo Jefferson of the New York Times enjoyed the way it broke up the book, as this allowed readers to read the passages out of sequence. The reliance on stories of body parts, functions, and human sexuality were also cited as a reason for what constituted the entirety of the book, and were not seen as compelling to some readers. In one instance the review was given by a high school student. == Publication history ==