Mook suggested that
Prodiplocynodon may be ancestral to
alligatorids and
crocodylids because it possessed features of both families. However, Mook also noted that some of the features observed in
Prodiplocynodon that are also found in modern crocodylians may be the result of
evolutionary convergence,
Phylogeny Prodiplocynodon was not included in a
phylogenetic study until 1996. In that study,
Prodiplocynodon was excluded from the
Alligatorinae because it lacked all seven of the unequivocal
synapomorphies that were proposed for the clade. According to the 1996 study, characters that exclude
Prodiplocynodon from Alligatorinae include the presence of a distinct lateral constriction between the premaxilla and maxilla, a contact between the
nasal and
lacrimal, and the lack of posterior massive crushing teeth. The 1996 analysis considered
Prodiplocynodon to be the
sister taxon to the Alligatorinae rather than the
Crocodylinae because in
Prodiplocynodon, the
jugal-lacrimal suture is much shorter than the ventral border of the orbit. However, the authors of the study mentioned that this character is also seen in some
derived crocodylines, and is lost in some ingroups of Alligatorinae. Successive phylogenetic studies have placed
Prodiplocynodon as a basal member of
Crocodyloidea along with
Asiatosuchus, as shown in the cladogram below: *Note: Tomistominae, which includes the extant
False Gharial, is sometimes considered to be a gavialoid lineage on the basis of genetic evidence. }} A 2018
tip dating study by Lee & Yates simultaneously using
morphological, molecular (
DNA sequencing), and
stratigraphic (
fossil age) data established the inter-relationships within
Crocodilia, which was expanded upon in 2021 by Hekkala
et al. using
paleogenomics by extracting DNA from the extinct
Voay. The below
cladogram shows the results of the latest studies, which placed
Prodiplocynodon outside of Crocodyloidea, as more
basal than
Longirostres (the combined group of crocodiles and gavialids). }} ==References==