ProEnglish has been a major part of the "English-as-official-language movement." The group also has opposed comprehensive immigration reform. The chief purpose of the organization at the time of its founding was to defend the
Arizona "Official English" ballot initiative, which was adopted in 1988, overturned by the
Arizona Supreme Court in 1998, and re-enacted in revised form by Arizona voters in 2006. In addition to seeking the enactment of laws and policies declaring English to be the official language, ProEnglish "seeks to end
bilingual education, repeal federal mandates for the translation of government documents and voting ballots in languages other than English." The
Anti-Defamation League wrote in 2014 that the group had a "nativist agenda and xenophobic origins and ties." The
Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks extremist groups in the United States,
designated the group as a
hate group in its 2014, 2015, and 2016 annual reports. ProEnglish was a major backer of the unsuccessful 2009
Nashville Charter Amendment 1, a local "English First"
ballot referendum in
Nashville, Tennessee, which would have generally required government communication and publications to be printed in English only. ProEnglish donated $82,500, about 92% of the total amount raised by the referendum's supporters. In
EEOC v. Kidmans (2005), ProEnglish helped fund the litigation costs of a small
drive-in restaurant in
Page, Arizona, that was sued by the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission after it refused to retract an English-on-the-job rule. The restaurant said that the rule was adopted to stop "trash talking" in the
Navajo language among employees, most of whom are
Navajo. The EEOC and the restaurant owners ultimately negotiated a settlement, in which the employers "may require employees to speak English while dealing with the public, but not at other times." ==See also==