In 2013, the Government released a resolution stating that the budget would be 57.1 billion rubles until 2017: 9 billion in 2013, 10.5 billion in 2014, 12 billion in 2015, 12.5 billion in 2016, and 13.1 billion in 2016. The university was still participating in the project, however, two years later the «Road Map» was reviewed. ; Economic Policies of the Ministry of Education and Science In late 2014, the Government planned to severely cut the funding for the program, however
Dmitry Livanov suggested keeping the amount of government support as it was before the economic crisis. He was notified that more funding would not be given and the Ministry would have to cover the difference from its own budget. ; Criticism of the Project The Ministry of Economic Development's initiative in the educational sector brought about much criticism. The economist,
Sergey Guriyev, who at the time was rector of the
New Economic School (NES), believed the government should subsidise student loans as it was responsible for the high interest rates. The Deputy Head of the
State Duma Committee on Education,
Vladimir Burmatov, sent an inquiry to
the Accounts Chamber with a request to investigate the full expenditure of funds allocated to the Ministry of Education for the program, as he believed there were a number of irregular spending. For example, sending money directly to the organisers of the rankings, large sums spent on organisers and participants hotel accommodation (about half a billion rubles), air travel (more than 4 million rubles), banquets (2.6 million rubles) and meetings (more than 2 million rubles). Burmatov's party "
United Russia", even raised the question whether Livanov should be excluded from the Party for "a failure to reform universities and a mess in the education system", but the head of the party, Dmitry Medvedev, rejected this proposal. Andrey Rostovtsev, physicist and founder of the
Dissernet project, supported Burmatov's claims. In his opinion, in order to develop confidence in Russian universities, it was necessary to restore the reputation of both the universities and their staff. The Ministry of Education considered this claim was unfounded and referred to regular progress reports of the participating universities. ==Russian universities and international ratings==