In the 1950s,
dendrochronologists were making active efforts to find the oldest living tree species. They intended to analyze the rings for various research purposes, such as evaluation of former climates, dating of archaeological ruins, and addressing the basic scientific question of maximum potential lifespan. Bristlecone pines in California's White Mountains and elsewhere were discovered by
Edmund Schulman to be older than any species yet discovered. This spurred interest in finding very old bristlecones, possibly older than the
Methuselah tree, aged by Schulman in 1957 at over 4,700 years.
Donald R. Currey was a graduate student at the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Currey was studying climate dynamics of the
Little Ice Age using
dendrochronology techniques. In 1963, he became aware of the bristlecone populations in the Snake Range in general, and on Wheeler Peak in particular. Based on the trees' size, growth rate and growth forms, he became convinced that some were very old,
cored some of them, and found trees exceeding 3,000 years in age, but Currey was not able to obtain a continuous series of overlapping cores from WPN-114. Here, stories diverge. It is not clear whether Currey requested, or Forest Service personnel suggested, that he cut down and section the tree in lieu of coring it. There is also some uncertainty as to why a core sample could not be obtained. One version has it that he broke or lodged his only long
increment borer and could not obtain another before the end of the field season; another claims he broke two of them, while another implies that a core sample was too difficult to obtain and also would not provide as much definitive information as a full cross-section of the tree. Currey said that the tree cores were too small and difficult to read so he used a chain saw to cut the tree down. In addition, there are conflicting views of Prometheus's uniqueness in the Wheeler Peak grove. It is reported that Currey and/or the Forest Service personnel who authorized the cutting believed the tree was just one of many large, very old trees in the grove. Others, at least one of whom was involved in the decision-making and tree cutting, believe that the tree was clearly unique — obviously older than other trees in the area. At least one person involved says that Currey knew that to be true at the time, although there is no known admission from Currey that he did, and others have disputed that the tree, based on observation alone, was obviously much older than the others. although the term has since been restricted to the cold climatic period extending from the 14th to the 19th centuries. The tree was cut down and sectioned in August 1964, and several pieces of the sections were hauled out to be processed and analyzed, first by Currey, then by others in later years. Sections or pieces of the tree have ended up in various places, some of them publicly accessible, including the
Great Basin National Park visitor center (
Baker, Nevada), the Ely Convention Center (
Ely, Nevada), the University of Arizona Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research (
Tucson, Arizona), and the U.S. Forest Service's
Institute of Forest Genetics (
Placerville, California). ==Repercussions==