MarketProof of Bertrand's postulate
Company Profile

Proof of Bertrand's postulate

In mathematics, Bertrand's postulate states that, for each , there is a prime such that . First conjectured in 1845 by Joseph Bertrand, it was first proven by Chebyshev, and a shorter but also advanced proof was given by Ramanujan.

Lemmas in the proof
The proof uses the following four lemmas to establish facts about the primes present in the central binomial coefficients. Lemma 1 For any integer n>0, we have :\frac{4^n}{2n} \le \binom{2n}{n}. Proof: Applying the binomial theorem, :4^n = (1 + 1)^{2n} = \sum_{k = 0}^{2n} \binom{2n}{k}=2+\sum_{k = 1}^{2n-1} \binom{2n}{k} \le 2n\binom{2n}{n}, since \tbinom{2n}{n} is the largest term in the sum in the left-hand side, and the sum has 2n terms (including the initial 2 outside the summation). Lemma 2 For a fixed prime p, define R = R(n,p) to be the p-adic order of \tbinom{2n}{n}, that is, the largest natural number r such that p^r divides \tbinom{2n}{n}. For any prime p, p^{R }\le 2n. Proof: The exponent of p in n! is given by Legendre's formula :\sum_{j = 1}^\infty \left\lfloor \frac{n}{p^j} \right\rfloor\!, so :R=\sum_{j = 1}^\infty \left\lfloor \frac{2n}{p^j} \right\rfloor - 2\sum_{j = 1}^\infty \left\lfloor \frac{n}{p^j} \right\rfloor=\sum_{j = 1}^\infty \left(\left\lfloor \frac{2n}{p^j} \right\rfloor - 2\!\left\lfloor \frac{n}{p^j} \right\rfloor\right) But each term of the last summation must be either zero (if n/p^j \bmod 1) or one (if n/p^j\bmod 1\ge1/2), and all terms with j>\log_p(2n) are zero. Therefore, :R \le \log_p(2n), and :p^R \le p^{\log_p(2n)} = 2n. Lemma 3 If p is an odd prime and \frac{2n}{3} , then R(n,p) = 0. Proof: There are exactly two factors of p in the numerator of the expression \tbinom{2n}{n}=(2n)!/(n!)^2, coming from the two terms p and 2p in (2n)!, and also two factors of p in the denominator from one copy of the term p in each of the two factors of n!. These factors all cancel, leaving no factors of p in \tbinom{2n}{n}. (The bound on p in the preconditions of the lemma ensures that 3p is too large to be a term of the numerator, and the assumption that p is odd is needed to ensure that 2p contributes only one factor of p to the numerator.) Lemma 4 An upper bound is supplied for the primorial function, :n\#=\prod_{p\,\le\,n}p, where the product is taken over all prime numbers p less than or equal to n. For all n\ge1, n\#. Proof: We use complete induction. For n=1,2 we have 1\#=1 and 2\#=2. Let us assume that the inequality holds for all 1\le n\le2k-1. Since n=2k>2 is composite, we have :(2k)\#=(2k-1)\# Now let us assume that the inequality holds for all 1\le n\le2k. Since \binom{2k+1}{k}=\frac{(2k+1)!}{k!(k+1)!} is an integer and all the primes k+2\le p\le2k+1 appear only in the numerator, we have :\frac{(2k+1)\#}{(k+1)\#}\le\binom{2k+1}{k}=\frac12\!\left[\binom{2k+1}{k}+\binom{2k+1}{k+1}\right] Therefore, :(2k+1)\#=(k+1)\#\cdot\frac{(2k+1)\#}{(k+1)\#}\le4^{k+1}\binom{2k+1}{k} ==Proof of Bertrand's Postulate==
Proof of Bertrand's Postulate
Assume that there is a counterexample: an integer n ≥ 2 such that there is no prime p with n \textstyle\binom{2n}{n} such that: • 2n p > \sqrt{2n}, the number \textstyle {2n \choose n} has at most one factor of p. By Lemma 2, for any prime p we have pR(p,n) ≤ 2n, and the number of primes less than or equal to x, \pi(x)\le x-1 since 1 is neither prime nor composite. Then, starting with Lemma 1 and decomposing the side into its prime factorization, and finally using Lemma 4, these bounds give: :\frac{4^n}{2n}\le\binom{2n}{n}=\left(\,\prod_{p\,\le\,\sqrt{2n}}p^{R(p,n)}\right)\!\!\left(\prod_{\sqrt{2n}\, Therefore :4^{n/3}, which simplifies to 2^\sqrt{2n} Taking the base-2 logarithm of and squaring both sides yields :2n By concavity of the right-hand side as a function of n for n\ge 2 and linearity of the left-hand side, the last inequality is necessarily verified on an interval. Since it holds true for n=426 and it does not for n=427, we obtain :n But these cases have already been settled, and we conclude that no counterexample to the postulate is possible. Addendum to proof It is possible to reduce the bound to n=50. For n\ge17, we get \pi(n), so we can say that the product p^R is at most (2n)^{0.5\sqrt{2n}-1}, which gives :\begin{align} &\frac{4^n}{2n}\le\binom{2n}{n}\le(2n)^{0.5\sqrt{2n}-1}4^{2n/3}\\ &4^{\sqrt{2n}}\le(2n)^3\\ &8n\le9\log_2^2(2n) \end{align} which is true for n=49 and false for n=50. ==References==
tickerdossier.comtickerdossier.substack.com