Critical response Eoin Friel, of The Action Elite, praised
Puncture Wounds, saying despite the film not having a "huge budget" or "spectacular action", it does have "plenty of hand-to-hand" combat and "well-developed characters". According to Friel, none of characters are "one dimensional or over the top", and Dolph Lundgren is "very restrained" and "genuinely scary" in his role. He went on to say that the script didn't have any "clunky dialogue", and to him, the "whole film" had a "real and gritty approach". Ian Jane, of
DVD Talk, awarded the film 3 out of 5 stars. He called it "fast paced and enjoyable if not particularly original", writing that "elements" were "borrowed" from
First Blood and
Rolling Thunder. Jane criticized the film's cinematography, saying that it relies "too heavily on shaky cam tactics". On the other hand, he complimented the film for being "fast paced, reasonably well acted, [very] violent and generally [a] solid [piece of] entertainment" for the "less demanding action movie aficionado". He summed up his review by calling
Puncture Wounds a "satisfying low budget action movie". Matthew Tilt, of
Stafford FM, gave the film a negative review, claiming that in "many ways", James Coyne made the "same mistake in his script as
Nick Love did with the British thriller
Outlaw. He takes a very real issue; the treatment of ex-soldiers, which is alluded to in a brief scene early on, and then goes on to portray them as mindless psychopaths". Describing the directing as "poor", Tilt said the only positive aspect of the film "would be some well-choreographed actions scenes", but even then it's "too much". Geek Syndicate heavily criticized the film, awarding 1 out of 5 stars. According to the website, the film is "clearly" one of those straight-to-video productions that Lundgren "hams up" for a pay check in between making sequels to
The Expendables. They went on to say the film is "pretty brutal" and "cruel" in places, and that it adds nothing to the story except "shock value". The review was summed up by advising any readers to "save" themselves the effort and "give the film a miss". == References ==