Purple Noon was lauded by critics and made Delon a star. In 1962, Clément and Gégauff won an
Edgar Award from the
Mystery Writers of America for Best Foreign Film Screenplay. The film enjoys a loyal
cult following, with fans including film director
Martin Scorsese.
Roger Ebert gave the film three stars (compared to the four-star review he gave to 1999's
The Talented Mr. Ripley), writing that "the best thing about the film is the way the plot devises a way for Ripley to create a perfect cover-up", while criticizing the "less than satisfactory ending", about which he wrote: "
Purple Noon ends as it does only because Clement doesn't have Highsmith's iron nerve."
James Berardinelli rated
Purple Noon higher than
The Talented Mr. Ripley, giving it a four-star review (compared to two-and-a-half stars for
The Talented Mr. Ripley). Berardinelli praised Delon's acting, writing that "Tom is fascinating because Delon makes him so", and also complimented the film for "expert camerawork and crisp direction". In the entry for
Purple Noon on Berardinelli's All-Time Top 100 list, he compared it to the 1999 film, saying: "The remake went back to the source material, Patricia Highsmith's
The Talented Mr. Ripley. The result, while arguably truer to the events of Highsmith's book, is vastly inferior. To say it suffers by comparison to
Purple Noon is an understatement. Almost every aspect of Rene Clement's 1960 motion picture is superior to that of
Minghella's 1999 version, from the cinematography to the acting to the screenplay.
Matt Damon might make a credible Tom Ripley but only for those who never experienced Alain Delon's portrayal." Nandini Ramnath, writing for Scroll.in, said: "The definitive portrayal of crime novelist Patricia Highsmith's most enduring creation was as early as 1960. Damon and
Hopper come close to conveying the ruthlessness and ambition of Tom Ripley, but Delon effortlessly captures his mystique." Highsmith's opinion of the film was mixed. She felt that Alain Delon was "excellent" in the role of Tom Ripley and described the film overall as "very beautiful to the eye and interesting for the intellect", but criticized the ending (in which it is implied that Ripley is to be caught by the police): "[I]t was a terrible concession to so-called public morality that the criminal had to be caught." ==Restoration and re-release==