The scientific journal
Nature published a 2003 paper by Kasahara and Kato that essentially stated that PQQ was a new vitamin, a cofactor required for the activity of an enzyme they believe to be involved in lysine metabolism (U26). In 2005, an article by Anthony and Felton that stated that the 2003 Kasahara Kato paper drew incorrect and unsubstantiated conclusions. Specifically, the databases used by the paper inappropriately labeled β-propeller sequences as PQQ-binding motifs. An article by
Bruce Ames in
The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2018 identified pyrroloquinoline quinone as a "longevity vitamin" not essential for immediate survival, but necessary for long-term health. Evidence of this identification include preclinical human studies, animal studies, and cell culture studies. == See also ==