Racoplaca melanobapha was originally
described by
August von Krempelhuber (1874) as
Verrucaria melanobapha. In the original account, Krempelhuber regarded the
taxon as somewhat doubtful and "fungoid", and its placement remained unsettled for decades.
Johannes Müller Argoviensis later re-examined the
type and suggested that it belonged near
Strigula subtilissima, but other authors continued to list the species under
Verrucaria or discussed it in connection with
Phylloporina. In his 1952 treatment of foliicolous lichens,
Rolf Santesson transferred the species to
Strigula as
Strigula melanobapha and concluded that several described lookalikes were the same species. In particular, he interpreted the type of
Strigula insignis and
S. linearis as unusually fine material of
S. melanobapha, and found that the type specimen selected for
S. fibrillosa also belongs to
S. melanobapha despite having been described as distinct on thallus characters. Santesson also pointed out that earlier attempts to separate members of this group using the reported identity of the symbiotic alga (e.g.,
Cephaleuros versus
Phycopeltis) were not a secure basis for species separation in the type material. Modern classifications place the species in
Racoplaca (
Strigulaceae) as
Racoplaca melanobapha. In a multi-locus
molecular phylogenetics study of foliicolous
Strigula lichens, Jiang and co-authors used five
genetic markers to reassess species limits and generic boundaries within
Strigulaceae, including
Racoplaca. In that work, they validated the combination
Racoplaca melanobapha, noting that an earlier attempt to publish the name was invalid because the
basionym had not been properly cited. The type of
Verrucaria melanobapha is from
Borneo, which anchors the name to Malesian material even though the species has often been discussed as a widespread tropical taxon in older literature. Jiang and co-authors emphasised that many leaf-dwelling Strigulaceae once treated as widespread under broad,
morphology-based species concepts have proven to contain multiple, sometimes morphologically
cryptic lineages when analysed with molecular data. They suggested that this pattern is likely to be under-detected outside the regions that have been sampled so far, so historical "pantropical" distribution claims for named taxa should be treated with caution until verified using modern data. In their synthesis, they estimated that hidden diversity in traditionally "known" species ranges from about twofold to fivefold across the group; in the limited material assessed so far,
Racoplaca melanobapha was among the taxa they considered to show roughly a twofold signal of such concealed diversity. This implies that some older records filed under
R. melanobapha (or its earlier names) may represent more than one species, pending targeted sequencing from the relevant regions. ==Description==