Early bills Initially proposed in March 2006, the
Civil Unions Bill 2006 was intended to established
civil unions for same-sex and opposite-sex couples, providing equal legal recognition to marriage under territory law.
Attorney-General Philip Ruddock said that the draft bill "[would] not satisfy the Commonwealth", which would intervene unless the bill was changed. The bill passed the
Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly on 11 May 2006. After the law had come into force on 9 June 2006, Ruddock announced that the Commonwealth would move to overrule it. On 13 June 2006, the
Federal Executive Council instructed
Governor-General Michael Jeffery to disallow the Act. In December 2006, the government indicated that it would proceed with new legislation recognising same-sex civil partnerships, based on the
United Kingdom partnership model. The
Attorney-General of the Australian Capital Territory,
Simon Corbell, stated, "It's still our intention to give the same level of recognition provided for in the Civil Unions Act." This second bill, the
Civil Partnerships Bill 2006, replaced the term "civil union" with "civil partnership", but was essentially the same in its effect as the previous bill. It was blocked again in February 2007.
Civil Partnerships Act 2008 In December 2007, following the
2007 federal election and the formation of a
Labor government, discussions on reintroducing a revised civil partnership bill resurfaced. Unlike his predecessor
John Howard, Prime Minister
Kevin Rudd said that he would not override ACT legislation allowing civil unions because it was "a matter for states and territories". The
Civil Partnerships Bill was introduced to the Legislative Assembly that same month, but quickly stalled. In February 2008, Attorney-General
Robert McClelland responded to the proposed ACT legislation, saying that the Rudd government would not allow civil unions, and reiterated the
Labor Party's preference for a system of state-based relationship registers, similar to
Tasmania's model. McClelland said that "the ceremonial aspects of the ACT model were inappropriate." The
Commonwealth Government was willing to accept state-based relationship registers so long as they did not "mimic marriage" by allowing a ceremony. McClelland's position was criticised by Senator
Bob Brown of the
Australian Greens, who called it "the ugly face of Labor conservatism." In May 2008, after several attempts to amend the scheme, Attorney-General Simon Corbell announced that the government had abandoned its civil partnership legislation, eliminated any ceremonial aspects, and settled for a system of relationship registers virtually identical to the ones operating in Tasmania and
Victoria. The Commonwealth Government had not compromised at any point during negotiations. The legislation passed the Legislative Assembly on 8 May 2008, granting same-sex couples increased access to
superannuation, taxation and social security law reforms. While legislative ceremonies were removed from the bill, an administrative ceremony may be performed by a representative of the ACT Register-General. The
Civil Partnerships Act 2008 commenced on 19 May 2008. The
Civil Partnerships Amendment Bill 2009 was presented to the Legislative Assembly by the
ACT Greens on 26 August 2009, allowing for ceremonies to be conducted with civil partnerships, which was the contentious item removed from the previous year's legislation.
Labor initially accused the Greens of "playing politics" by resurrecting the issue, but unanimously backed the bill as a matter of principle as it was Labor Party policy to support civil unions. The bill was approved by legislators on 11 November after an amendment was inserted banning opposite-sex couples from having a civil partnership ceremony. This made the ACT the first territory in the country to legalise civil partnership ceremonies for same-sex couples. The Commonwealth Government threatened to void the legislation, but after discussions, Attorney-General McClelland said that the issue had been resolved satisfactorily. The
Civil Partnerships Act 2008 was subsequently repealed upon passage of the
Civil Unions Act 2012; however, entering into civil partnerships, which are now regulated by the
Domestic Relationships Act 1994, remains an option for same-sex and opposite-sex couples.
Civil Unions Act 2012 On 22 August 2012, the
Civil Unions Act 2012 passed the Legislative Assembly 11–6 following legal advice that the Commonwealth Government had removed its ability to legislate for territorial and state same-sex union laws after it defined marriage as only "between man and woman" in the
Marriage Amendment Act 2004. The civil union law granted many of the same rights to same-sex couples as people married under the
Marriage Act. The Act was not challenged by the
Gillard government. The Act was to have been repealed upon commencement of the
Marriage Equality (Same Sex) Act 2013, which, had it not been struck down by the
High Court, would have legalised same-sex marriage in the territory. Due to the High Court holding the ACT's same-sex marriage law to be invalid, the
Civil Unions Act 2012 remained in force until 2017. From 9 December 2017, forming a new civil union is no longer possible as section 7 of the Act requires that potential couples be unable to marry under the
Marriage Act 1961. When same-sex marriage was legalised, it became legally impossible to form a civil union, though existing ones remain valid. The government stated that civil unions performed prior to that date and not converted into marriages would remain valid. ==Same-sex marriage==