In the late 1940s,
Automatism in Quebec quietly established itself, influenced by the works of
Nietzsche and
Freud. Borduas, however, did not associate with any party, and was considered an
anarchist, with
Refus Global being a comment on the decadence of Christian civilization.
Refus Global scandalized authorities and the press, who condemned and censored a large part of the manifesto. Borduas lost his job as a professor at the École du Meuble de Montréal, Besides this, however, the manifesto did not cause much immediate disruption due to the near total absence of mass media such as television.
Marcel Barbeau, in the documentary
Les Enfants de Refus global, would go on to explain that
Refus Global was not a well-delineated social movement, but rather a manifesto against a very closed social structure. Only later would
Refus Global come to be associated with the social-democratic and nationalist movements. In the 1980s, a period where Quebec was striving to clarify its identity and political autonomy, Borduas was perceived as a hero, saving the cultural integrity of the
French Canadian population. Since then,
Refus Global has become a reference for the idea that the
Grande Noirceur had not drowned out all innovative intellectual life in Quebec; as a result, it is seen as a precursor to the
Quiet Revolution. Fifty years later, the interpretation of
Refus Global in the intellectual history of Quebec continues to be the subject of reflections. In 1998, the Condorcet Prize was given to all the signatories of
Refus Global. That same year,
Manon Barbeau released the film
Les Enfants de Refus Global. ==See also==