The discovery of Sedna renewed the old question of just which
astronomical objects ought to be considered
planets, and which ones ought not to be. On 15 March 2004, articles on Sedna in the popular press reported that a tenth planet had been discovered. This question was resolved for many astronomers by applying the International Astronomical Union's
definition of a planet, adopted on 24 August 2006, which mandated that a planet must have
cleared the neighborhood around its orbit. Sedna is not expected to have cleared its neighborhood; quantitatively speaking, its
Stern–Levison parameter is estimated to be much less than 1. The IAU also adopted
dwarf planet as a term for the largest non-planets (despite the name) that, like planets, are in
hydrostatic equilibrium and thus can display planet-like geological activity, yet have not cleared their orbital neighborhoods. Sedna is bright enough, and therefore large enough, that it is expected to be in hydrostatic equilibrium. Hence, astronomers generally consider Sedna a dwarf planet. The list of dwarf planets recognized by the IAU has not changed since 2006, even though Sedna is considered to be one by most astronomers. Besides its physical classification, Sedna is also categorized according to its orbit. The Minor Planet Center, which officially catalogs the objects in the Solar System, designates Sedna only as a trans-Neptunian object (as it orbits beyond Neptune), as does the
JPL Small-Body Database. The question of a more precise orbital classification has been much debated, and many astronomers have suggested that the
sednoids, together with similar objects such as , be placed in a new category of distant objects named
extended scattered disc objects (E-SDO),
detached objects,
distant detached objects (DDO), or
scattered-extended in the formal classification by the
Deep Ecliptic Survey. == Exploration ==