The U.S. Constitution establishes an
Executive Branch of government. It is, therefore, left to normal statute law to establish inferior offices and agencies, under the President, by which the government can operate. Despite the broad authority granted by the
United States Constitution to the president, they do not have "unilateral and unrestrained authority over the Executive Branch" and "congressional action is required to create Executive Branch departments, to fund them, to determine the nature and scope of their duties and to confirm the appointment of their top leaders". While the president manages the conduct of executive branch offices, "it is Congress, not the President, that establishes departments and agencies, and to whatever degree it chooses, the internal organization of agencies".
Delegation of legislative authority The
nondelegation doctrine is a principle that the Congress, being vested with "all legislative powers" by
Article One, Section 1 of the
United States Constitution, cannot delegate that power to anyone else. However, the Supreme Court ruled in
J. W. Hampton, Jr. & Co. v. United States (1928) that congressional delegation of legislative authority is an
implied power of Congress that is constitutional so long as Congress provides an "
intelligible principle" to guide the executive branch: "'In determining what Congress may do in seeking assistance from another branch, the extent and character of that assistance must be fixed according to
common sense and the inherent necessities of the government co-ordination.' So long as Congress 'shall lay down by legislative act an intelligible principle to which the person or body authorized to [exercise the delegated authority] is directed to conform, such legislative action is not a forbidden delegation of legislative power.'"
Unicameral legislative veto A unicameral legislative veto has been a feature of the oversight authority built into several instances of presidential reorganization authority.
United States Attorney-General William D. Mitchell early expressed concern that the
Economy Act of 1932, the first instance of presidential reorganization authority, was
unconstitutional on the basis of it allowing the exercise of the so-called "legislative veto" by only one chamber of Congress. The act provided that either the
Senate or the
House of Representatives could annul an
executive order issued by the president under the reorganization authority. In Mitchell's view, a single chamber of Congress was constitutionally incompetent to act by itself; the legislative power could only be exercised by the two chambers jointly, he argued. The decision in
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha created the possibility that every previous reorganization was effectively null and void; to avoid the potential administrative chaos that might have ensued, Congress enacted legislation retroactively approving all previous reorganizations. ==History==