Res extensa vs. res cogitans
Res extensa and
res cogitans are mutually exclusive and this makes it possible to conceptualize the complete intellectual independence from the body. On the other hand,
res extensa, are entities described by the principles of logic and are considered in terms of definiteness. Due to the polarity of these two concepts, the natural science focused on
res extensa. The categorical separation of these two, however, caused a problem, which can be demonstrated in this question: How can a wish (a mental event), cause an arm movement (a physical event)? Descartes has not provided any answer to this but
Gottfried Leibniz proposed that it can be addressed by endowing each geometrical point in the
res extensa with mind. Each of these points is within
res extensa but they are also dimensionless, making them unextended. In Descartes' substance–attribute–mode ontology, extension is the primary attribute of corporeal substance. He describes a piece of wax in the Second
Meditation (see
Wax argument). A solid piece of wax has certain sensory qualities. However, when the wax is melted, it loses every single apparent quality it had in its solid form. Still, Descartes recognizes in the melted substance the idea of wax. ==See also==