Resignation of Raeesah Khan

On 3 August 2021, Raeesah made an allegation against the Singapore Police Force (SPF) during a parliamentary debate on empowering women. She alleged that, in 2018, a police officer made inappropriate comments about the attire and alcohol consumption of a 25-year-old rape victim, whom she had accompanied to make a police report, and gave recommendations to increase sensitivity in investigations. Desmond Tan, Minister of State for Home Affairs, subsequently called the allegations "serious" and "[needing] investigation". When asked for details, Raeesah declined, saying that she did not wish to re-traumatise the victim and that her claim was not an isolated case. She also agreed to file a parliamentary question about questions related to the issue, claiming to have been unsuccessful in contacting the victim after the incident happened. She said that she would communicate directly with the Ministry of Home Affairs in a similar future situation. On 1 October, Singh sent an email reminding incumbent WP MPs of parliamentary etiquette. On 4 October, K. Shanmugam, Minister for Law and Home Affairs, stated that the police had not found any cases that fit Raeesah's description after checking its records and requested that she elaborate on the allegation. In response, Raeesah reaffirmed her statement while declining to reveal any further detailsincluding the police station they went toclaiming confidentiality concerns. On 20 October, the police said that an "extensive" search had not managed to identify the case in question and that she had not responded to their requests to provide more details about the case. On 1 November, Raeesah admitted that she had lied on three occasions about the alleged incident in Parliament. She did not accompany the victim to make a police report, and had heard about the incident from a support group for women victiof sexual assault. The victim also did not consent for her to share the incident in Parliament. Attempting to defend herself, Raeesah said that she had been sexually assaulted at 18 while studying abroad. Indranee, the Leader of the House, made an official complaint against her of violating parliamentary privilege and requested that it be referred to the Committee of Privileges (COP). The following day, the WP approved the formation of a separate disciplinary panel to investigate Raeesah's conduct, comprising Singh, Faisal, and party chairperson Sylvia Lim. On 26 November, the Office of the Clerk of Parliament announced that the COP had started working on the complaint against her. == Resignation ==

On 30 November 2021, Raeesah resigned from Parliament and the WP following the probe over her admission of lying. She also posted her letter of resignation, addressed to Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin, on her social media accounts. Despite the resignation, the COP announced that it would continue its investigation. Two days later, Singh announced at a press conference that, despite having known about the allegation's falsehood the week after her speech, the WP leadership allowed Raeesah to "clarify" herself in Parliament. A shingles episode made the original decision to do so in September unlikely; she repeated the allegation instead upon her return to Parliament on 4 October. He claimed that, before Raeesah's resignation, the leadership had voted overwhelmingly to ask her to resign, and that she would have been otherwise expelled. Instead, she informed him that she would resign, shortly before the central executive committee (CEC) was due to meet on the matter. He also said that she had been instructed to substantiate the allegation readily. Faisal, the party's vice-chairperson and an incumbent MP for Aljunied GRC, was also made an advisor to the Sengkang MPs, which Singh claimed addressed concerns on the lack of a minority MP for Sengkang GRC. The party stated that, while "not [deterred] from fielding young and progressive candidates in future elections", it would "review how candidates [were] selected for elections as well as vetting of speeches". == Aftermath ==

After investigations, the COP recommended on 10 February 2022 that Raeesah be fined $35,000 and that Singh and Faisal be referred to the Public Prosecutor. The recommendations were accepted at a parliamentary debate on 15 February. On 29 April, the case was referred to the SPF to allow them to interview further related witnesses. On 19 March 2024, the SPF and Attorney-General's Chambers announced that Faisal would not receive charges for his refusal to answer questions asked by the COP. He was instead formally advised to "familiarise himself with the conduct expected of Members of Parliament under the Parliament (Privileges, Immunities and Powers) Act" and to avoid any possible violations of it. Trial of Pritam Singh During the trial, the prosecution sought the maximum $7,000 that Singh could be fined for each count, portraying him as having intended to leave undisclosed the falsehood of Raeesah's allegation. The deputy chief prosecutor accused Singh of lying to protect his own political capital in an "undoubtedly serious and dishonourable" betrayal of Raeesah and two WP cadres who testified against him. The defence instead argued for a maximum of $4,000 per count, with Singh's lawyer saying that the process started from Raeesah's lie. On 17 February 2025, Singh was fined $14,000; he indicated that he would appeal the decision. The judge accepted Raeesah's testimony and said that Singh had wilfully lied to the COP. Singh paid the fine after the High Court dismissed his appeal on 4 December. On 3 January 2026, the WP CEC ordered the establishment of an internal disciplinary panel on Singh's conviction for lying to Parliament. It was announced on 20 January that the panel comprised He Ting Ru and Jamus Lim, two of the incumbent MPs for Sengkang GRC, and Png Eng Huat, a former MP for Hougang Single Member Constituency (SMC). Removal of Pritam Singh as Leader of the Opposition On 9 January 2026, Indranee filed a motion to declare Singh unsuitable as the Leader of the Opposition. The motion stated that his continuation would "undermine the standing of parliament and public confidence in the integrity of Singapore's political system" and that his conduct was "dishonourable and unbecoming of a Member of Parliament"; he disputed both statements during the debate and said that his "conscience [would] always be clear". On 14 January, all PAP and Nominated MPs (NMPs) voted for the motion and all WP MPs, other than absent non-constituency MP (NCMP) Eileen Chong, voted against it; as a result, Singh was removed the next day by Prime Minister Lawrence Wong, who invited the WP to nominate another of its elected MPs to the role. After deliberation, the WP rejected the offer to nominate a new Leader of the Opposition through its website on 21 January, claiming that the leader of the largest opposition party in Parliament was themself the leader of the opposition. In response, the Prime Minister's Office announced on the same day that it had accepted the rejection and that the position would remain vacant until the party was "ready to nominate someone to take on the responsibility". On 12 March, a case management conference was held and Singh was announced to be under disciplinary proceedings by the Law Society of Singapore. On 4 April, the WP announced that its investigations into Singh had been completed and submitted to the CEC alongside the internal disciplinary panel's recommendations. A notice of a special cadre members' conference, requested by certain cadre members, was expected to be released in two weeks' time. The CEC met on 28 and 29 April to consider the disciplinary panel's report, and statedly considered that Singh never had "any intention to act in a manner contrary to the principles, aims, or objects of the party, or prejudicial to the welfare of the party". On 30 April, Singh was formally reprimanded in writing; the cadre conference was expected in two weeks' time. Political analysts responded negatively to the reprimand. Analyst Felix Tan believed that the WP had given a "slap on the wrist" by concluding that Singh did not intend to lie, while Eugene Tan, a law professor at Singapore Management University, said that the outcome was expected yet unbelievable and that the party obviously intended to have the scandal permanently forgotten. ==Notes==