Late in 1861, seeking to raise revenue for the American Civil War effort without exhausting its reserves of gold and silver, the United States federal government suspended specie payments, or the payments made in gold and silver in redemption of currency notes. Early in 1862, the United States issued legal-tender notes, called
greenbacks. By war's end, a total of million in greenbacks had been issued, and authorization had been given for another million in small denominations, known as fractional currency or "shin plasters." The issuance of greenbacks caused
inflation during the period. Immediately after the Civil War during Reconstruction, there were large capital inflows into the United States and a general improvement in the
export-to-import ratio since the export-dominant South was reintegrated with the North. The
United States Treasury, however, had increased its cash balance through the summer of 1873 by selling gold for million.
National banks also increased issuance of national bank notes by million. The failure of several railroad companies including
Jay Cooke & Company on their bond obligations encouraged capital outflows from the United States to Europe and weakened demand for dollars leading to the
Panic of 1873. Increased Treasury cash balances, continued issuance of national bank notes, and capital outflows together depreciated the currency. These factors further caused a reduction in reserves held by monetary institutions because higher prices increased domestic demand for currency. Reserves held by banks were insufficient to be able to meet seasonal demands in autumn of 1873 as greenback reserves declined from million in September 1873 to million in October 1873. Tensions surrounding the Panic of 1873 between creditors and debtors revived the specie payment resumption debate. Two views dominated this debate. Conservatives and the creditor class favored "
hard money"; they favored resumption as a method for making up losses incurred due to dollar depreciation during the past decade. The resumption of specie payments was perceived as a method to curb the rise in the price level and eventually equate currency with gold. For creditors, that had issued debts in inflated greenbacks, resumption would increase the
real interest rate that they received. Supporters of the Resumption Act argued that the Panic of 1873 might not have occurred had there been sufficient reserves of gold in the United States Treasury as would have been the case if specie payments were resumed. Opposed to resumption, a new coalition of agrarian and labor interests found common cause during Reconstruction in advocating for "soft money" or the promotion of inflationary
monetary policies. These groups viewed the Panic of 1873 as the result of insufficient currency that should have been used to fuel the growth in production that occurred in the South and the West. These regions relied on cheap money – that is low interest rates – to be able to continue to grow. Other soft money advocates included gold
speculators and the railroad industry.
Collis P. Huntington and other railroad leaders called for further greenback issuance in light of harsh business conditions that made honoring debt obligations difficult. Opponents of the Resumption Act also argued that many debt obligations were made in an environment in which there existed a premium on gold, that is that inflation in the currency in the previous decade made gold relatively more valuable than currency. Resumption therefore entailed up to a 50% increase in debt obligation if gold and currency equalized. For manufacturers, the rising price of gold made domestic prices cheaper relative to import prices since many European currencies including
sterling were fixed to the price of gold. Hence continued inflationary measures such as further issuance of greenbacks artificially supported domestic industries. Hard and soft money interests often did cross party lines, although a larger portion of
Democrats were hard money advocates. Following the Democratic victory in
the congressional elections of 1874, the
lame-duck Republican Congress passed the Resumption Act on January 14, 1875. It required the
Secretary of the Treasury to redeem greenbacks in specie on demand on or after 1 January 1879. The Act, however, did not provide for a specific mechanism for redemption. The Act, though, did allow the Secretary of Treasury to acquire gold reserves either via any federal surpluses or the issuance of
government bonds. An established gold reserve allowed for daily variations in specie flows and facilitated resumption. The act abolished the
seigniorage fee on coining gold and substituted silver for any still existing fractional currency. The Resumption Act set no limit on the quantity of national bank notes that could be issued; this idea became known as "free banking." This provision led many conservatives to believe that the Act was inflationary in nature. However, the Resumption Act also required that greenbacks be retired in a proportion of 80% of new national bank note issue, which in theory aimed to contract the money supply and hence encourage dollar appreciation such that gold and currency might equate. However, in practice the effect was mild: the total quantity of greenbacks in circulation fell from million at the end of 1874 to million following the passage of the Resumption Act. The Resumption Act was hotly debated during the 1880 presidential election, with most western politicians opposed to it. Specie payments had finally resumed during the presidency of
Rutherford B. Hayes. Aided by the return of prosperity in 1877, Secretary of the Treasury
John Sherman accumulated a gold reserve to be redeemed for existing greenbacks mostly from transactions with Europe. Sherman earmarked a redemption fund by January 1, 1879, that amounted to million acquired from the sale of bonds to Europe and Treasury surplus. However, when people found greenbacks to be on par with gold, they lost their desire for redemption. ==Reaction and evaluation==