In educational settings, peer revision, or feedback, is a common
collaborative writing practice. In organizational and other workplace settings where
collaborative writing is common, participation of multiple writers facilitates communal revision. Recently, due to the collaborative capabilities of the
Internet, there are writers who "
crowdsource" reviews from several people, who contribute digital annotations. Teachers' prompts that incorporate the process of invention spark collaboration and communication amongst students in the classroom, producing feedback between peers.
Peer review allows writers to learn from one another and assess issues that may have been overlooked. It gives writers an outside perspective, increasing their understanding of how their writing is being interpreted by their intended audience. It allows students to learn and strategize with one another.
Peer feedback engages the concept of
discourse communities, where individuals share genres, language, values, concepts, and "ways of being" too better the group as a whole. Discourse communities give writers a space to collaborate with those who have a suitable degree of relevant content or who share a common set of goals. For further reading see the reference guide: A. Horning & A. Becker (Eds.) (2006).
Revision: History, Theory, and Practice. Parlor Press and WAC Clearinghouse. ==References==