Rhodocactus

Like all cacti, Rhodocactus species have a succulent habit and specialized structures, areoles, that bear spines. They differ from most cacti in having persistent leaves. They grow as trees, tall. When mature, their stems develop bark, but its development is delayed, and all the species other than Rhodocactus nemorosus (Pereskia nemorosa) retain stomata. The areoles of Rhodocactus species can form "brachyblasts", called "spur shoots" by Beat Leuenberger. The areole initially forms in the axil of a leaf (stage A in the diagram below). This leaf may be lost, leaving a leaf scar, and leaves may grow on the areole (stage B). The areole may then grow out to form a brachyblast – a short, very crowded shoot that bears leaves (stage C). Later this may form a longer, but still short shoot that has its own areoles (stage D). Asai and Miyata regard the formation of brachyblast leaves as a distinguishing characteristic of the genus in comparison to Pereskia. Rhodocactus flowers are about in diameter. File:Areole and brachyblast development in Rhodocactus.svg|Areole and brachyblast development in Rhodocactus File:Pereskia grandifolia var. violacea 2020-02-08 7117.jpg|Areole on a young stem of R. grandiflorus is in the axis of the auxoblast leaf (stage A) File:Pereskia grandifolia 15zz crop.jpg|Areoles on this stem of R. grandiflorus have brachyblast leaves (stage B) File:Pereskia tampicana 1.jpg|Short shoot of R. grandiflorus (stage D) ==Taxonomy==

Rhodocactus was originally described as a subgenus of Pereskia by Alwin Berger, and was raised to a genus in 1936 by Frederik Marcus Knuth. The genus was later sunk back into in a broadly defined genus Pereskia. Molecular phylogenetic studies from 2005 onwards suggested that when circumscribed in this way, Pereskia was not monophyletic, and consisted of three clades. By 2016, each clade was recognized as a separate genus, one of which is Rhodocactus. Only the type species of Knuth's circumscription of the genus, Rhodocactus grandifolius, belonged to the clade re-described as Rhodocactus. The other species were mostly newly transferred from Pereskia. A consensus cladogram from a 2005 study is shown below with the more recent generic assignments added. It shows that the three genera are basal to the rest of the cacti. }} }} In 2025, a major study of the phylogenomics and classification of cacti by De Vos et al. did not recognize Rhodocactus, based on sparse taxon sampling. , Plants of the World Online agreed, accepting Rhodocactus as a synonym of Pereskia. Species Species that have been placed in Rhodocactus include: Other species that have also been placed in Rhodocactus include: • Rhodocactus bleo (F.M.Knuth) F.M.Knuth = Leuenbergeria bleo F.M.Knuth) Lodé • Rhodocactus guamacho (F.A.C.Weber) F.M.Knuth = Leuenbergeria guamacho (F.A.C.Weber) Lodé • Rhodocactus horridus (DC.) F.M.Knuth = Pereskia horrida D.C. • Rhodocactus lychnidiflorus (D.C.) F.M.Knuth = Leuenbergeria lychnidiflora (D.C.) Lodé • Rhodocactus portulacifolius (L.) F.M.Knuth = Leuenbergeria portulacifolia (L.) Lodé • Rhodocactus zinniiflorus (D.C.) F.M.Knuth = Leuenbergeria zinniiflora (D.C.) Lodé ==References==