Environmental risks In 1986, right after the
Chernobyl disaster,
Ulrich Beck, a sociology professor at LMU Munich, published the original German text,
Risikogesellschaft, of his highly influential and catalytic work (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt 1986).
Risikogesellschaft was published in English as
Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity in 1992. The ecological crisis is central to this social analysis of the contemporary period. Beck argued that environmental
risks had become the predominant product, not just an unpleasant, manageable side-effect, of industrial society.
Giddens and Beck argued that whilst humans have always been subjected to a level of risk – such as
natural disasters – these have usually been perceived as produced by non-human forces. Modern societies, however, are exposed to risks such as
pollution, newly discovered illnesses, crime, that are the result of the
modernization process itself. Giddens defines these two types of risks as
external risks and
manufactured risks.
Manufactured risks are marked by a high level of
human agency involved in both producing, and mitigating such risks. As
manufactured risks are the product of human activity, authors like Giddens and Beck argue that it is possible for societies to assess the level of risk that is being produced, or that is about to be produced. This sort of reflexive introspection can in turn alter the planned activities themselves. As an example, due to disasters such as
Chernobyl and the
Love Canal Crisis, public faith in the modern project has declined leaving public distrust in
industry,
government and
experts. Social concerns led to increased regulation of the nuclear power industry and to the abandonment of some expansion plans, altering the course of modernization itself. This increased critique of modern industrial practices is said to have resulted in a state of
reflexive modernization, illustrated by concepts such as
sustainability and the
precautionary principle that focus on preventive measures to decrease levels of risk. There are differing opinions as to how the concept of a risk society interacts with social hierarchies and class distinctions. Most agree that social relations have altered with the introduction of manufactured risks and reflexive modernization. Risks, much like
wealth, are distributed unevenly in a population and will influence quality of life. Beck has argued that older forms of class structure – based mainly on the accumulation of wealth – atrophy in a modern, risk society, in which people occupy
social risk positions that are achieved through risk aversion. "In some of their dimensions these follow the inequalities of class and strata positions, but they bring a fundamentally different distribution logic into play". Beck contends that widespread risks contain a "boomerang effect", in that individuals producing risks will also be exposed to them. This argument suggests that wealthy individuals whose
capital is largely responsible for creating pollution will also have to suffer when, for example, the contaminants seep into the water supply. This argument may seem oversimplified, as wealthy people may have the ability to mitigate risk more easily by, for example, buying bottled water. Beck, however, has argued that the distribution of this sort of risk is the result of
knowledge, rather than wealth. Whilst the wealthy person may have access to
resources that enable him or her to avert risk, this would not even be an option were the person unaware that the risk even existed. However, risks do not only affect those of a certain social class or place, as risk is not missed and can affect everyone regardless of societal class; no one is free from risk. By contrast, Giddens has argued that older forms of class structure maintain a somewhat stronger role in a risk society, now being partly defined "in terms of differential access to forms of self-actualization and empowerment". Giddens has also tended to approach the concept of a risk society more positively than Beck, suggesting that there "can be no question of merely taking a negative attitude towards risk. Risk needs to be disciplined, but active risk-taking is a core element of a dynamic economy and an innovative society." ==References==