As with the other Cassegrain-configuration reflectors, the Ritchey–Chrétien telescope (RCT) has a very short optical tube assembly and compact design for a given
focal length. The RCT offers good off-axis optical performance, but its mirrors require sophisticated techniques to manufacture and test. Hence the Ritchey–Chrétien configuration is most commonly found on high-performance professional telescopes.
Two-mirror foundation A telescope with only one curved mirror, such as a
Newtonian telescope, will always have aberrations. If the mirror is spherical, it will suffer primarily from
spherical aberration. If the mirror is made parabolic, to correct the spherical aberration, then it still suffers from
coma and
astigmatism, since there are no additional design parameters one can vary to eliminate them. With two non-spherical mirrors, such as the Ritchey–Chrétien telescope, coma can be eliminated as well, by making the two mirrors' contribution to total coma cancel. This allows a larger useful field of view. However, such designs still suffer from astigmatism. The basic Ritchey–Chrétien two-surface design is free of third-order
coma and
spherical aberration. However, the two-surface design does suffer from fifth-order coma, severe large-angle
astigmatism, and comparatively severe
field curvature.
Further corrections by a third element When focused midway between the sagittal and tangential focusing planes, stars appear as circles, making the Ritchey–Chrétien well suited for wide field and photographic observations. The remaining aberrations of the two-element basic design may be improved with the addition of smaller optical elements near the focal plane. Astigmatism can be cancelled by including a third curved optical element. When this element is a mirror, the result is a
three-mirror anastigmat. Alternatively, a RCT may use one or several low-power lenses in front of the focal plane as a field-corrector to correct astigmatism and flatten the focal surface, as for example the
SDSS telescope and the
VISTA telescope; this can allow a field-of-view up to around 3° diameter. The
Schmidt camera can deliver even wider fields up to about 7°. However, the Schmidt requires a full-aperture corrector plate, which restricts it to apertures below 1.2 meters, while a Ritchey–Chrétien can be much larger. Other telescope designs with front-correcting elements are not limited by the practical problems of making a multiply-curved Schmidt corrector plate, such as the
Lurie–Houghton design.
Aperture obstruction In a Ritchey–Chrétien design, as in most Cassegrain systems, the secondary mirror blocks a central portion of the aperture. This ring-shaped entrance aperture significantly reduces a portion of the
modulation transfer function (MTF) over a range of low spatial frequencies, compared to a full-aperture design such as a refractor. This MTF notch has the effect of lowering image contrast when imaging broad features. In addition, the support for the secondary (the spider) may introduce diffraction spikes in images.
Mirrors The
radii of curvature of the primary and secondary mirrors, respectively, in a two-mirror Cassegrain configuration are: :R_1 = -\frac{2DF}{F - B} = -\frac{2F}{M} and :R_2 = -\frac{2DB}{F - B - D} = -\frac{2B}{M-1}, where • F is the effective
focal length of the system, • B is the back focal length (the distance from the secondary to the focus), • D is the distance between the two mirrors and • M = (F - B)/D is the secondary magnification. If, instead of B and D, the known quantities are the focal length of the primary mirror, f_1, and the distance to the focus behind the primary mirror, b, then D = f_1(F - b)/(F + f_1) and B = D + b. For a Ritchey–Chrétien system, the
conic constants K_1 and K_2 of the two mirrors are chosen so as to eliminate third-order spherical aberration and coma; the solution is: :K_1 = -1 - \frac{2}{M^3}\cdot\frac{B}{D} and :K_2 = -1 - \frac{2}{(M - 1)^3}\left[M(2M - 1) + \frac{B}{D}\right]. Note that K_1 and K_2 are less than -1 (since M>1), so both mirrors are hyperbolic. (The primary mirror is typically quite close to being parabolic, however.) The hyperbolic curvatures are difficult to test, especially with equipment typically available to amateur telescope makers or laboratory-scale fabricators; thus, older telescope layouts predominate in these applications. However, professional optics fabricators and large research groups test their mirrors with
interferometers. A Ritchey–Chrétien then requires minimal additional equipment, typically a small optical device called a
null corrector that makes the hyperbolic primary look spherical for the interferometric test. On the
Hubble Space Telescope, this device was built incorrectly (a reflection from an un-intended surface leading to an incorrect measurement of lens position) leading to the error in the Hubble primary mirror. Incorrect null correctors have led to other mirror fabrication errors as well, such as in the
New Technology Telescope.
Additional flat mirrors In practice, each of these designs may also include any number of flat
fold mirrors, used to bend the optical path into more convenient configurations. This article only discusses the mirrors required for forming an image, not those for placing it in a convenient location. ==Examples of large Ritchey–Chrétien telescopes==