The Camargue received a varied reception, having ranked as one of the "10 Worst Cars"'as chosen in 2010 by readers of
The Globe and Mail; and having ranked 92 in a 2008 poll of the 100 ugliest cars of all time by readers of
The Daily Telegraph. Autoblog said the Camargue had been ranked "conspicuously low on the list," adding the Camargue "really was horrid, no matter how well it sold." In response, noted automotive journalist
James May said the Camargue "is not ugly, either. It has presence, like that pug-faced but well-dressed bloke down the pub." In his 2019 study of the car, Bernard L. King argues that the Camargue was an important statement-car, proving that the motor-division of Rolls-Royce could bring new product to market after its near financial ruin following the collapse and nationalisation of the
Rolls-Royce aero-division. In addition, its high price-point not only raised much needed revenue for the cash-strapped motor company, it also acted as a "halo" car
avant la lettre, generating new customer interest in the marque, showroom footfall, and increased sales of the relatively more economical
Silver Shadows. As King writes:It proved to be what is known in the motor industry as a "traffic builder". [...] When the 1976 Rolls-Royce sales figures for the USA were totalled, it was revealed that there had been a massive 42 percent increase over those in 1975, with 1,230 cars delivered to customers compared with the 1975 figure of 865. This substantial increase David Plastow [then managing director of Rolls-Royce] put down to 'the heightened awareness of the Rolls-Royce marquee [sic] generated by the introduction of the Camargue to the American market'. ==References==