in Mikael Agricola Church, Helsinki. This view is sometimes erroneously identified as
consubstantiation in that it asserts the simultaneous presence of four essences in the
Eucharist: the consecrated bread, the body of Christ, the consecrated wine, and the blood of Christ; but it differs in that it does not assert a "local" (three-dimensional, circumscribed) presence of the body and blood in the sacramental bread and wine respectively, which is rejected as "gross, carnal, and Capernaitic" in the
Formula of Concord. The term "consubstantiation" has been associated with such a "local" inclusion of the Body and Blood of Christ in the sacramental bread and wine as has the term "
impanation." Lutherans have also rejected the designation of their position as consubstantiation because they believe it, like
transubstantiation, is a philosophical explanation of the
Real Presence, whereas the sacramental union provides a description of the Real Presence. Martin Luther distinguished this doctrine from that of transubstantiation and impanation in this way: The Lutheran doctrine of the sacramental union is also distinct from the
Reformed view. The
Calvinistic view of Christ's presence in the Lord's Supper (a real, spiritual presence) is that Christ is truly present at the meal, though not substantially and particularly joined to the elements. This is in line with their general belief that "the finite cannot contain the infinite" (
finitum non est capax infiniti). Lutherans, on the other hand, describe the Personal Union of the two natures in Christ (the divine and the human) as sharing their predicates or attributes more fully. The doctrine of the sacramental union is more consistent with this type of Christology. The
Lutheran scholastics described the Reformed Christological position which leads to this doctrine as the
extra calvinisticum, or "Calvinistic outside," because the
Logos is thought to be outside or beyond the body of Christ.
Reformed theology also uses the term "sacramental union", not as an explanation of Christ's presence but in reference to the union between "sign and thing signified." ==See also==