Lawsuits involving the P320 include the following (listed chronologically). This list is not exhaustive.
Steyr Arms, Inc. v. Sig Sauer, Inc. In May 2017,
Steyr Arms, Inc. filed a patent infringement lawsuit against SIG Sauer via the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Steyr refers to their patent US6260301 (filed in 1999 and approved in 2001), which is for a handgun with a removable chassis. Steyr Arms requested a preliminary and permanent injunction to stop SIG Sauer from manufacturing and selling its
P250 and P320 pistols. On 25 February 2020, the
United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire granted SIG Sauer summary judgment, finding that SIG Sauer did not infringe Steyr's patents and dismissed all motions.
Sheperis v. Sig Sauer, Inc. On August 4, 2017, four days before the Voluntary Upgrade Program was announced,
Stamford Police Department
SRT officer Vincent Sheperis filed a negligence action in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut against SIG Sauer after his holstered P320 allegedly fell from the back of his vehicle and discharged a round into his knee on January 4, 2017. Although SIG reassured the public that the P320 design met industry standards regarding its drop safety, Sheperis's attorney, Jeff Bagnell, stated that the upgrade was telling. "The suit has been validated already", he said, adding that having SIG recall and fix the alleged defect is one of the demands listed in the complaint. SIG settled the case in June 2018.
Vadnais v. Sig Sauer, Inc. On May 4, 2018,
Loudoun County deputy sheriff Marcie D. Vadnais, through her attorney, Jeffrey S. Bagnell, filed a negligence action against SIG Sauer in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia after her holstered P320 allegedly discharged and broke her femur in half in February 2018 as she was removing it from her belt. The case settled on May 29, 2019, the second day of a jury trial.
Leo Nielsen Trading ApS and Glock Ges.m.b.H v. Danish Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organization On March 15, 2019, Glock disputed the adoption of the P320 X-Carry into Danish military service, claiming the P320 did not meet
DALO specification No. 79, which stated "No parts of the pistol shall be possible to mount incorrectly or in the wrong places." The case was won by Leo Nielsen Trading ApS and
Glock Ges.m.b.H as they proved the ejector could be assembled incorrectly, were paid 30,000
Danish krones, and the purchase was cancelled. Later the contract was put out with different requirements, which the P320 fulfilled.
Ortiz v. Sig Sauer, Inc. In September 2019, an Arizona gun owner who purchased a P320 in September 2016 initiated a class action lawsuit. It claims that SIG Sauer "continued to sell the flawed gun to the public", In March 2020, Judge
Joseph N. Laplante denied SIG Sauer's motion to dismiss the case. The motion for class certification was denied in 2022.
Green-Berrios v. Sig Sauer Inc. On January 4, 2022, a police officer, Elvis Ramon Green-Berrios, filed a lawsuit with the
United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico claiming that his service pistol, a P320, discharged without the trigger being pulled. Specifically, "As soon as he took hold of the holster at his waistband inside his pants, the P320 fired and hit him in his right thigh...". The lawsuit was dismissed in March 2025 after the plaintiff "admitting in court filed documents that his P320 pistol has no defects and does not discharge without a trigger pull." In a press release, SIG Sauer asserted this was the "18th frivolous or unsupported P320 unintentional discharge lawsuit dismissed".
Armendariz, et al. v. Sig Sauer, Inc. On November 30, 2022, a lawsuit was filed in U.S. federal court alleging several P320 pistols unintentionally fired "without the trigger being pulled or deliberately actuated by the user". The lawsuit claims there have been "over 100 incidents" of such discharges, "many of which have caused severe injury". An attorney representing the lawsuit's plaintiffs, Robert Zimmerman, said it was the largest lawsuit against SIG Sauer involving the P320 on behalf of people who were injured. The 20 plaintiffs in the case (20 individuals and about a dozen spouses) are from 13 different states.
Anderson, et al. v. Sig Sauer, Inc. On March 26, 2025, a group of 22 plaintiffs from 16 states filed a negligence and product liability lawsuit against SIG Sauer, asserting "uncommanded firing" of P320 pistols. The lead attorney for the plaintiffs claimed, "Sig knowingly designed and manufactured America's most dangerously-defective firearm". The lawsuit was filed with the
United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire.
Sig Sauer, Inc. v. Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission On June 11, 2025, Sig Sauer filed a lawsuit against the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission (WSCJTC), Washington State's police academy, and their executive director, Monica Alexander, following its ban of the P320 from use on their firing ranges. The WSCJTC had banned the P320 following a report from an instructor in 2024 that a trainee's P320 had fired on a range without a trigger pull and established a task force investigating the weapon's safety prior to the ban. ==Users==