guards. , the most prominent nobleman of his times and a representative of Sarmatism. Adherents of Sarmatism acknowledged the vital importance of
Poland since it was considered an oasis of the
Golden Liberty for Polish nobility, otherwise surrounded by antagonistic realms with
absolutist governments. They also viewed Poland as the bulwark of true
Christendom, almost surrounded by the
Muslim Ottoman Empire, and by the errant Christianity of the
Orthodox Russians and the
Protestant Germans and Swedes. What contemporary Polish historians consider to be one of the most essential features of this tradition is not Sarmatist ideology, but the manner in which the
Rzeczpospolita was governed. The democratic concepts of
law and order,
self-government and elective offices constituted an inseparable part of Sarmatism. Yet it was democracy only for the few. The king, though elected, still held the central position in the state, but his power was limited by various
legal acts and requirements. Moreover, only the nobles were given political rights, namely the vote in the
Sejmik and the
Sejm. The idea of uninamity that had already developed in the 15th century Sejms of Poland was later abused following the demoralisation of the times of the Deluge, which left the Rzeczpospolita depopulated and looted. Beginning with Siciński's veto, every
poseł (or member of the Sejm), had the right to exercise a now so-called
liberum veto, which could block the passage of a proposed new resolution or law. Finally, in the event that the king failed to abide by the laws of the state, or tried to limit or question nobles' privileges, they had the right to refuse the king's commands, and to oppose him by force of arms. Although thus avoiding
absolutist rule, unfortunately the central state power became precarious, and vulnerable to
anarchy. The
political system of the
Rzeczpospolita was regarded by the nobility as the best in the world, and the Polish Sejm as (factually) the oldest. The system was frequently compared to
Republican Rome and to the Greek
polis – though each of these eventually surrendered to imperial rule or to
tyrants. The
Henrician Articles were considered to be the foundation of the system. Every attempt to infringe on these laws was treated as a great crime. Yet despite fruits of
golden age Poland and the Sarmatist culture, the country would enter a period of national decline; it brought in a narrow cultural conformity. Nonetheless, a crippling political anarchy came to reign, due to cynical use of the
free veto by individual
szlachta in the
Sejm, and/or to the acts of unpatriotic kings. During the late eighteenth century, the woeful state of the polity resulted in the three
Polish Partitions by neighboring military powers. "Was the Sarmatian way of life worth preserving? Some aspects of it, no doubt. But because the gentry insisted on jealously guarding its privileges, preventing their extension to other social groups, it doomed the structure of the Commonwealth to atrophy and to the revenge of the lower orders. ... Sarmatism was an ideological shield against the historical realities which contradicted it at every turn." Since its original popularity among the former szlachta, Sarmatism itself went into political decline. It has since seen revision and revival, followed by eclipse. ==Religion==