The Monthly Film Bulletin wrote: "Despite good model work and attempts at space spectacle,
Satellite in the Sky remains, for the most part, disappointingly trite and unconvincing. The rocket ship's crew, including a large percentage of "problem" characters, is augmented by the unlikely presence of a lady reporter, who spends most of the time asking foolish questions. Faced with such an unpromising story, Paul Dickson has been unable to work up much interest in its outcome."
Bosley Crowther of
The New York Times described the weakness in the plot: "the trouble with this film is that it makes space travel so simple that it is without surprise or kick." Film critic
Leonard Maltin called
Satellite in the Sky "elaborate but unexciting."
The Radio Times Guide to Films gave the film 2/5 stars, calling the film a: "full-throttled, but hopelessly inadequate space opera", adding "Lois Maxwell displays none of Miss Moneypenny's sang-froid as a stowed-away pacifist reporter. But no one stands a chance of making much impression alongside Donald Wolfit's risibly bombastic inventor." In
British Sound Films: The Studio Years 1928–1959 David Quinlan rated the film as "mediocre", writing: "Laughable space-age heroics." The review in
Video Movie Guide 2002 called it a "Tedious sci-fi adventure memorable for a fun performance by Donald Wolfit as the bomb's eccentric inventor." == Notes ==