Schwartz kernel theorem

Let X and Y be open sets in \mathbb{R}^n. Every distribution k \in \mathcal{D}'(X \times Y) defines a continuous linear map K \colon \mathcal{D}(Y) \to \mathcal{D}'(X) such that for every u \in \mathcal{D}(X), v \in \mathcal{D}(Y). Conversely, for every such continuous linear map K, there exists one and only one distribution k \in \mathcal{D}'(X \times Y) such that () holds. The distribution k is the kernel of the map K. Note Given a distribution k \in \mathcal{D}'(X \times Y), one can always write the linear map K informally as :Kv = \int_{Y} k(\cdot,y) v(y) d y so that :\langle Kv,u \rangle = \int_{X} \int_{Y} k(x,y) v(y) u(x) d y d x. ==Integral kernels==

The traditional kernel functions K(x,y) of two variables of the theory of integral operators having been expanded in scope to include their generalized function analogues, which are allowed to be more singular in a serious way, a large class of operators from \mathcal{D} to its dual space \mathcal{D}' of distributions can be constructed. The point of the theorem is to assert that the extended class of operators can be characterised abstractly, as containing all operators subject to a minimum continuity condition. A bilinear form on \mathcal{D} arises by pairing the image distribution with a test function. A simple example is that the natural embedding of the test function space \mathcal{D} into \mathcal{D}' - sending every test function f into the corresponding distribution [f] - corresponds to the delta distribution :\delta(x-y) concentrated at the diagonal of the underlined Euclidean space, in terms of the Dirac delta function \delta. While this is at most an observation, it shows how the distribution theory adds to the scope. Integral operators are not so 'singular'; another way to put it is that for K a continuous kernel, only compact operators are created on a space such as the continuous functions on [0,1]. The operator I is far from compact, and its kernel is intuitively speaking approximated by functions on [0,1]\times[0,1] with a spike along the diagonal x=y and vanishing elsewhere. This result implies that the formation of distributions has a major property of 'closure' within the traditional domain of functional analysis. It was interpreted (comment of Jean Dieudonné) as a strong verification of the suitability of the Schwartz theory of distributions to mathematical analysis more widely seen. In his ''Éléments d'analyse'' volume 7, p. 3 he notes that the theorem includes differential operators on the same footing as integral operators, and concludes that it is perhaps the most important modern result of functional analysis. He goes on immediately to qualify that statement, saying that the setting is too 'vast' for differential operators, because of the property of monotonicity with respect to the support of a function, which is evident for differentiation. Even monotonicity with respect to singular support is not characteristic of the general case; its consideration leads in the direction of the contemporary theory of pseudo-differential operators. == Smooth manifolds ==

Dieudonné proves a version of the Schwartz result valid for smooth manifolds, and additional supporting results, in sections 23.9 to 23.12 of that book. == Generalization to nuclear spaces ==

Much of the theory of nuclear spaces was developed by Alexander Grothendieck while investigating the Schwartz kernel theorem and published in . We have the following generalization of the theorem. Schwartz kernel theorem: Suppose that X is nuclear, Y is locally convex, and v is a continuous bilinear form on X \times Y. Then v originates from a space of the form X^{\prime}_{A^{\prime}} \widehat{\otimes}_{\epsilon} Y^{\prime}_{B^{\prime}} where A^{\prime} and B^{\prime} are suitable equicontinuous subsets of X^{\prime} and Y^{\prime}. Equivalently, v is of the form, : v(x, y) = \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \lambda_i \left\langle x, x_i^{\prime} \right\rangle \left\langle y, y_i^{\prime} \right\rangle for all (x, y) \in X \times Y where \left( \lambda_i \right) \in l^1 and each of \{ x^{\prime}_1, x^{\prime}_2, \ldots \} and \{ y^{\prime}_1, y^{\prime}_2, \ldots \} are equicontinuous. Furthermore, these sequences can be taken to be null sequences (i.e. converging to 0) in X^{\prime}_{A^{\prime}} and Y^{\prime}_{B^{\prime}}, respectively. ==See also==