The taxon was first described as the genus
Chionodoxa by
Pierre Edmond Boissier in 1844.
Chionodoxa was distinguished from the genus
Scilla by two features: the
tepals are joined at their bases to form a tube rather than being free; and the
stamens have flattened stalks (filaments), which look almost like a cup in the centre of the flower. From the 1970s onwards, Speta in particular argued that
perianth features were not informative in the family Hyacinthaceae (here subfamily
Scilloideae), and that
Chionodoxa was closely related to
Scilla bifolia, the type species of the genus
Scilla. A 1999
phylogenetic study, based on
plastid DNA, included some species which have been placed in
Chionodoxa and showed that they were embedded within
Scilla. The relevant part of the cladogram is shown below (with recent names); two former
Chionodoxa species are shaded in yellow. }} Submerging
Chionodoxa within
Scilla was resisted for a long time; for example Dashwood and Mathew kept
Chionodoxa separate in 2005. In 2009, Bohumil Trávníček and coauthors proposed treating the genus
Chionodoxa as
Scilla sect.
Chionodoxa, a proposal adopted by other workers.
Species The number of species accepted in the group has varied. Several of the species are very similar, and the number of species recognized as distinct has differed significantly from one source to another. For example, plants occurring in Crete have at one time or another been put into three species (then in the genus
Chionodoxa):
C. albescens,
C. cretica and
C. nana. In 1987, Sfikas'
Wild flowers of Crete recognized only two of these (as
C. cretica and
C. nana); in 1993, the
Natural History Museum's checklist of the Cretan Flora recognized only one (
Scilla nana). In 2005, the
Royal Horticultural Society distinguished between
C. forbesii and
C. siehei, as did Yildirim et al. in 2017 (now using the genus
Scilla). , the
World Checklist of Selected Plant Families sank
S. siehei into
S. forbesii. , the
World Checklist of Selected Plant Families accepted the following species formerly placed in
Chionodoxa: •
Scilla cretica, syn.
Chionodoxa cretica (Cretan glory-of-the-snow) – Crete •
Scilla forbesii, syns
Chionodoxa forbesii (Forbes' glory-of-the-snow),
C. siehei (Siehe's glory-of-the-snow),
C. tmoli,
C. tmolusii – south-west and west Turkey •
Scilla lochiae, syns
Chionodoxa lochiae (Loch's glory-of-the-snow),
C. gigantea – Cyprus •
Scilla luciliae, syn.
Chionodoxa luciliae (Lucile's glory-of-the-snow) – west Turkey •
Scilla nana, syns
Chionodoxa nana (dwarf glory-of-the-snow),
C. albescens (pale glory-of-the-snow) – Crete •
Scilla sardensis, syn.
Chionodoxa sardensis (lesser glory-of-the-snow) – west Turkey ==Distribution==