Sumner contends that inflation is "measured inaccurately and does not discriminate between
demand versus
supply shocks" and that "Inflation often changes with a lag...but nominal GDP growth falls very, very quickly, so it'll give you a more timely signal stimulus is needed". He argued that
monetary policy can offset
austerity policies such as those pursued by the British government during the
Great Recession. By November 2011, however, economists from
Goldman Sachs were advocating that the Federal Reserve adopt a nominal income target.
Nathan Sheets, a former top official at the Federal Reserve and the head of
international economics at
Citigroup, proposed that the Federal Reserve adopt a nominal consumption target instead. Sumner has argued that one cannot account for the impact of
fiscal policy without first considering how
monetary policy may affect the outcome; fiscal stimulus may not succeed if monetary policy is tightened in response. Economic journalists have referred to this as the Sumner Critique, akin to the
Lucas critique. Summarizing this thinking,
The Economist suggested that a growth rate of 5.3% would result in concerns over (future) inflation and tightening of monetary policy, largely because 5.3% is beyond both projections and goals of the Federal Reserve. == Other views ==