After his graduation from high school in 1907, Tromp entered the
Society of Jesus at Canisius College in
Nijmegen. He studied in the novitiate at Mariëndaal, and continued on for a triennium in philosophy at
Oudenbosch. An exceptional Latinist, Tromp achieved a doctorate in
Classical Languages from the
University of Amsterdam in 1921. He received
Holy Orders on 8 October 1922 and thus became a Jesuit priest; he completed his theological studies in 1926 at the
Pontifical Gregorian University. Until 1929, Tromp taught as a professor of Latin, Greek, and fundamental theology at the
Theologicum of the Jesuit Order in
Maastricht, when he was relocated to the Gregorian University as an instructor in the same subject. Tromp quickly attracted attention, and in 1936 he was appointed consultator of the
Holy Office. Tromp had already elaborated on the dangers of
Nazism by 1937, and translated and referenced the encyclical 1937
Mit brennender Sorge against the errors and dangers of the National Socialist state. He was appointed apostolic visitator, and performed apostolic visitations of professors at Dutch
major seminaries and the
Catholic University of Nijmegen in 1939, after the end of the
Second World War, and in 1955. The purpose of these visits was to expose the teaching of
Neo-Modernist theological propositions—especially those directly condemned in the 1907 encyclical
Pascendi dominici gregis. He came under some criticism for the zeal with which he carried out these examinations. In 1951, Tromp was made a member of the
Royal Academy of Sciences of Belgium. While progressive theologians despised his doctrinal orthodoxy, he was not a humorless academic, and became a much-loved preacher during annual meetings of the minor seminary at
Rolduc. He also had a true pastoral personality, helping several couples obtaining an
annulment of their previous marriages in the Vatican, but only after a rigid investigation; even valid annulments were often rejected as impious and sinful in the strict Catholic atmosphere of the Dutch parishes before 1960.
Second Vatican Council At the
Second Vatican Council, Tromp served as secretary of the Preparatory Theological Commission at the specific request of Pope John XXIII, and, later, as the secretary of the Doctrinal Commission under Cardinal
Alfredo Ottaviani. His preparations—or
schemata—were shelved, after some Western European Council fathers appealed to Pope John XXIII for total free debate on all issues.
Karl Rahner considered Tromp to be a formidable theological opponent during the council debates, and gently asserted that "[Tromp] thought his schemata would simply need the blessing of the Council fathers and that would be the council. But all his schemata disappeared—not a single one was discussed".
Ratzinger and Tromp Others opposed Tromp as well. At the Council,
Karl Rahner was joined by
Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI),
Aloys Grillmeier, Otto Semmelroth and
Hans Küng, all of whom worked for the German Cardinals
Josef Frings of Cologne and
Julius Döpfner of Munich and Freising. Some of them opposed the schemata drawn up by Ottaviani and Tromp's preparatory commission, and when the group achieved the shelving of these schemata, it meant that the Council Fathers no longer had any written basis of preparation, and, consequently, that the conciliar bishops had no structure, strategy, or agenda to rely on. Ratzinger was opposed to this radical move by the Rahner group, believing that it effectively derailed the Council. In his memoirs, he presents a balanced view of Tromp's schemata: [Cardinal Joseph Frings] began to send me [the schemata] regularly in order to have my criticism and suggestions for improvement. Naturally I took exception to certain things, but I found no grounds for a radical rejection of what was being proposed. It is true that the documents bore only weak traces of the biblical and patristic renewal of the last decades, so that they gave an impression of rigidity and narrowness through their excessive dependency on scholastic theology. In other words, they reflected more the thought of scholars than that of shepherds. But I must say that they had a solid foundation and had been carefully elaborated. == Theological influence ==