Since the 1970s,
National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAAs),
intelligence authorization acts (IAAs), and
Department of Defense appropriations acts (DODAAs) have usually included secret law in the form of classified addenda. Since about 2015, the branches of the United States federal government have accused one another of creating secret law. Journalists, scholars, and anti-secrecy activists have also made similar allegations. Scholarly analysis has shown that secret law is present in all three branches. One scholar, Professor Dakota Rudesill, recommends that the country affirmatively decide whether to tolerate secret law, and proposes principles for governing it, including: public law's supremacy over secret law; no secret criminal law; public notification of creation of secret law; presumptive sunset and publication dates; and availability of all secret law to Congress. The
Brennan Center for Justice includes in the category of secret law in the United States classified opinions of the Executive
Office of Legal Counsel, described as "authoritative legal interpretations that have the same legal force as the statutes they interpreted"; taken by the
Bush administration following the
September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The
Patriot Act has been referred to as having secret interpretations. ==Secret rules in UK public places==