Positive and negative priming The terms
positive and
negative priming refer to when priming affects the speed of processing. A positive prime speeds up processing, while a negative prime lowers the speed to slower than un-primed levels. Positive priming is caused by simply experiencing the stimulus, while negative priming is caused by experiencing the stimulus, and then ignoring it. Positive priming effects happen even if the prime is not consciously perceived. Positive priming is thought to be caused by spreading activation. Conceptual priming is based on the meaning of a stimulus and is enhanced by semantic tasks. For example, the word
table will show conceptual priming effects on the word
chair, because the words belong to the same category.
Repetition priming Repetition priming, also called direct priming, is a form of positive priming. When a stimulus is experienced, it is also primed. This means that later experiences of the stimulus will be processed more quickly by the brain. This effect has been found on words in the
lexical decision task. There are multiple theories and models that reason why repetition priming might exist. For example, facilitation suggests that when a stimulus overlaps with existing or previously seen representation than information will travel faster.
Semantic priming In semantic priming, the prime and the target are from the same semantic category and share features. For example, the word
dog is a
semantic prime for
wolf, because the two are similar animals. Semantic priming is theorized to work because of
spreading activation within associative networks. An example of this would be that the morpheme 'psych' can prime for the word 'psychology'. In support with further detail, when an individual processes a word sometimes that word can be affected when the prior word is linked semantically. Previous studies have been conducted, focusing on priming effects having a rapid rise time and a hasty decay time. For example, an experiment by Donald Foss researched the decay time of semantic facilitation in lists and sentences. Three experiments were conducted and it was found that semantic relationships within words differs when words occur in sentences rather than lists. Thus, supporting the ongoing discourse model. However, the underlying cognitive mechanisms of semantic representation has been established over a few decades, the research has suffered from small sample sizes and lack of linguistic and cultural diversity. Nevertheless, recently it has been shown that the semantic priming is a robust and generalizable effect across languages and cultures.
Associative priming In associative priming, the target is a word that has a high probability of appearing with the prime, and is "associated" with it but not necessarily related in semantic features. The word
dog is an associative prime for
cat, since the words are closely associated and frequently appear together (in phrases like "raining cats and dogs"). A similar effect is known as context priming. Context priming works by using a context to speed up processing for stimuli that are likely to occur in that context. A useful application of this effect is reading written text. The grammar and vocabulary of the sentence provide contextual clues for words that will occur later in the sentence. These later words are processed more quickly than if they had been read alone, and the effect is greater for more difficult or uncommon words. When a speeded motor response is performed to classify the target stimulus, a prime immediately preceding the target can thus induce response conflicts when assigned to a different response as the target. These response conflicts have observable effects on motor behavior, leading to priming effects, e.g., in response times and error rates. A special property of response priming is its independence from visual awareness of the prime: For example, response priming effects can increase under conditions where visual awareness of the prime is decreasing.
Masked priming The masked priming paradigm has been widely used in the last two decades in order to investigate both
orthographic and
phonological activations during visual
word recognition. The term "masked" refers to the fact that the prime word or
pseudoword is masked by symbols such as ###### that can be presented in a forward manner (before the prime) or a backward manner (after the prime). These masks enable to diminish the visibility of the prime. The prime is usually presented less than 80 ms (but typically between 40-60 ms) in this paradigm. In all, the short SOA (Stimuli Onset Asynchrony, i.e. the time delay between the onset of the mask and the prime) associated with the masking make the masked priming paradigm a good tool to investigate automatic and irrespective activations during visual word recognition. Forster has argued that masked priming is a purer form of priming, as any conscious appreciation of the relationship between the prime and the target is effectively eliminated, and thus removes the subject's ability to use the prime strategically to make decisions. Results from numerous experiments show that certain forms of priming occur that are very difficult to occur with visible primes. One such example is
form-priming, where the prime is similar to, but not identical to the target (e.g., the words
nature and
mature). Form priming is known to be affected by several psycholinguistic properties such as prime-target frequency and overlap. If a prime is higher frequency than the target, lexical competition occurs, whereas if the target has a higher frequency than the prime, then the prime pre-activates the target and if the prime and target differ by one letter and one phoneme, the prime competes with the target, leading to lexical competition. Not only is it affected by the prime and target, but also by individual differences such that people with well-established lexical representations are more likely to show lexical competition than people with less-established lexical representation.
Kindness priming Kindness priming is a specific form of priming that occurs when a subject experiences an act of kindness and subsequently experiences a lower threshold of activation when subsequently encountering positive stimuli. A unique feature of kindness priming is that it causes a temporarily increased resistance to negative stimuli in addition to the increased activation of positive associative networks. This form of priming is closely related to
affect priming.
Affective priming Affective or affect priming entails the evaluation of people, ideas, objects, goods, etc., not only based on the physical features of those things, but also on affective context. Most research and concepts about affective priming derive from the affective priming paradigm where people are asked to evaluate or respond to a stimuli following positive, neutral, or negative primes. Some research suggests that valence (positive vs. negative) has a stronger effect than arousal (low vs. high) on lexical-decision tasks. Affective priming might also be more diffuse and stronger when the prime barely enters conscious awareness. Evaluation of emotions can be primed by other emotions as well. Thus, neutral pictures, when presented after unpleasant pictures, are perceived as more pleasant than when presented after pleasant pictures.
Cultural priming Cultural priming is a technique employed in the field of
cross-cultural psychology and
social psychology to understand how people interpret events and other concepts, like
cultural frame switching and
self-concept. For example, Hong and colleagues showed participants a different set of culture related images, like the U.S. Capitol building or Chinese temples. Then participants watched a clip of a fish swimming ahead of a group of fish. After Chinese cultural priming, participants in
Hong Kong were more likely to see the fish as acting in response to the group, such as agreeing with the statement, "the one fish is being chased/rejected by the other fish." In contrast, after seeing symbols of U.S. culture, participants were more likely to see the fish as acting based on internal causes, such as agreeing with the statement, "the one fish is independent from the other fish." In short, when people from
bi-cultural societies are primed with symbols from different cultures, they are more likely to give explanations (attributions) that are more common in that culture. For example, in one study, identification accuracy of old Chinese characters was significantly higher than baseline measurements (i.e., the priming effect), while identification accuracy of novel characters was significantly lower than baseline measurements (i.e., the anti-priming effect). Anti-priming is said to be the natural antithesis of repetition priming, and it manifests when two objects share component features, thereby having overlapping representations. However, one study failed to find anti-priming effects in a picture-naming task even though repetition priming effects were observed. Researchers argue that anti-priming effects may not be observed in a small time-frame. ==Replicability controversy==