In 2007, Turner and colleagues assigned
Shanag to the
Dromaeosauridae. Their
cladistic analysis indicated that it was a basal dromaeosaurid but higher in the tree than the
Unenlagiinae. In 2012,
Shanag was recovered as a sister taxon to the
Unenlagiinae. In 2013, Agnolín and Novas claimed that the traits of
Shanag once used to identify the taxon as a dromaeosaurid closely related to the unenlagiines, were actually found in many other groups of
paravian theropods such as the
troodontids,
avialans, and other basal paravians, with some features suggesting that it is more likely an avialan. Thus, they concluded that
Shanag can only be identified as a basal
averaptoran. A 2017 study still recovered
Shanag as a dromaeosaurid based on phylogenetic analyses, but as a sister taxon to Laurasian dromaeosaurids from the Late Cretaceous and not related to unenlagiines. In 2019, Agnolín and colleagues argued that
Shanag cannot be confidently classified as a dromaeosaurid other than being a
paravian. In 2024, Porfiri and colleagues classified
Shanag and
Pyroraptor as sister taxa to unenlagiines, while Wang and Pei recovered
Shanag within Serraraptoria which includes
microraptorians and
eudromaeosaurians. ==See also==