The oldest artefact-bearing layer at the site was dated at 2.12 million years ago, while the youngest was dated to 1.26 million years, indicating that the site was occupied (not necessarily continuously) for 850,000 years. Some of the supposed tools were found with bone fragments of animals including deer and bovines. The findings are potentially highly significant as, according to the authors of the study, they may represent one of the earliest evidence of
hominins outside Africa after
Masol(
fr) in India (the Masol finds are controversial as well), surpassing
Dmanisi in the
Caucasus region of
Georgia, which is the oldest confirmed
Lower Paleolithic site outside Africa, dating to 1.85 million years ago. It is also older than the
Yuanmou Man, the oldest hominin fossils found in East Asia, dating to 1.7 million years. As the Shangchen site lacks volcanic minerals which are abundant in African sites, the study dated the sediments using the
paleomagnetism method. The authors of the study argue that a natural origin of the claimed artefacts is ruled out as Shangchen and its immediate vicinity have no known ancient rivers, which might have carved natural rocks into shapes resembling human-made tools. Uninvolved scientists who reviewed the findings such as Michael Petraglia, an archaeologist at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, Germany consider the dates convincing. Study co-author Robin Dennell talking to a
Nature News reporter was cited as speculating that "the Shangchen toolmakers belonged to an earlier species in the genus Homo" than
H. erectus, and one William Jungers (unaffiliated with the study) is cited as even reserving "the possibility that the Shangchen toolmaker was a species of
Australopithecus". == References ==