While no modern scholarship accepts any part of the Yellow Emperor body of myth as describing historical events, traditional
Chinese historiography viewed them as real. Shaohao's place in the succession is not dateable to early sources on the topic, and has its source in the so-called "
Ancient Script Texts" only. In a theory that has since been discredited, by the
Doubting Antiquity School, represented by
Kang Youwei,
Gu Jiegang, and
Qian Mu, posited that Shaohao was inserted into the orthodox lineage during the
Han dynasty by imperial librarian
Liu Xin, as part of a wide-ranging campaign to revise ancient texts in order to justify the present monarch—either the Han imperial house, or the brief
Xin dynasty that overthrew it. According to the theory, Liu Xin was keen to create a narrative which would satisfactorily reflect the
five phases theory of dynastic succession, a "generative cycle" that rotated between different lineages, which would together legitimise the rule of either the Han, the Xin, or both. There is debate whether that Shaohao was a real or legendary ruler of the
Dongyi, a people who lived in eastern China. It is theorized that the worship of Shaohao was brought west into
Qin by migration. Documentary evidence of Shaohao originates in the extant version of the ancient text
Zuozhuan, but the lineage recited there that includes Shaohao is not corroborated by contemporaneous or earlier texts. The Doubting Antiquity School therefore theorizes that Liu Xin fabricated Shaohao from an existing but separate legendary figure, and inserted him into the early royal lineage during his edit of the
Zuozhuan. More recent proponents of Shaohao's historicity cites tribal totems found in
Dawenkou Culture sites resembling a proto-form of the character "hao". ==Legacy==