King Charles, was stunned by the suddenness of the catastrophic loss of Bristol, and dismissed Rupert from all his offices and ordered him to leave England. In a letter to Rupert, Charles wrote "you assured me you would keep Bristol for four months. Did you keep it four days?". Some
Whig historians have argued that the king was completely delusional in his belief that Bristol could be held. They argue that his belief was so strong that the only explanation he could find was one of gross dereliction of duty. Others argue that he believed Rupert was to stage a coup, a belief stoked by his enemies at court — namely, Digby — who even went as far as to suggest he had been bribed to surrender. The fall of Bristol meant that
Chester was the only important seaport remaining to connect the English Royalists with Ireland. The war was by this point all but over. The resources to continue the fight collapsed in the south of England but the king managed to hold onto some fortified town for another 9 months before surrendering to the Scots. Upon hearing of the surrender, the
House of Commons voted to reinstate
Nathaniel Fiennes to his seat. He had previously been disgraced after failing to hold Bristol in 1643, but it was now clear that the town was less defensible than assumed.
Oliver Cromwell once again (as after Naseby) wrote to the Commons arguing in support of the Independent faction on the grounds that his men had fought and died for the cause of religious liberty. His words were reprinted and led to an increase in the factional tension that would eventually end in the
military coup of 1648. ==Citations==