Position of the defenders (Hooks) All that remained of the Hook party in Holland after the July 1351
Battle of Zwartewaal were some castles that the party occupied. For the isolated
Brederode Castle,
Groot Poelgeest, and
Oud Haerlem Castle the situation looked hopeless.
Vreeland castle on the border with Utrecht was in a better position, but Geertruidenberg Castle probably had the best chance to hold out. One of the reasons why Geertruidenberg Castle was so strong, was that it was probably very difficult to cut its supply routes. The Hook Strijen Castle was less than 5 km to the south over a good road. Whether Strijen Castle was a Brabant or a Holland castle was debatable, but its owner Willem van Duvenvoorde was a mighty member of the Hook party. A simple blockade with a few forces would be dangerous, because these could be surprised by a raiding party from Strijen Castle. This is proven by the delay between Geertruidenberg switching to the Cod side on 15 June 1351, and the start of the blockade or siege. This was at least three and a half months later, perhaps even more than half a year later. A second reason for the strength of Geertruidenberg, was that Willem van Duvenvoorde was a very important leader of the Hook party. He was probably its most important leader after Margaret. Van Duvenvoorde was very wealthy and would have used his riches to invest in the defense of Geertruidenberg Castle, and with it Strijen Castle. A third reason why Geertruidenberg Castle was so strong remained obscure until very recently. In the 16th century, the castle was completely demolished and disappeared out of view. With the scant descriptions and probably unreliable images that survived, historians assumed that Geertruidenberg Castle was a typical medieval square castle with square towers, much like
Medemblik Castle or
Muiden Castle. The archaeological excavation of the castle in 2001 indeed found a straight wall of at least 32 m long. In 2006 it was followed by an investigation with ground penetrating radar. This indicated that the main castle measured about 50 by 50 m. I.e. Geertruidenberg Castle was about twice the size of the average square castle in Holland. The defenders were led by
Philips I, Lord of Polanen, a younger brother of
John II, Lord of Polanen, the lord of Geertruidenberg and castellan of the castle. John II got these fiefs from his father
John I, Lord of Polanen, who in turn got them from his half brother of Willem van Duvenvoorde.
Attackers (Cods) After the July 1351
Battle of Zwartewaal, William's Cod party had little reason for concern in Holland itself. In the
County of Zeeland however, the (then) major city of
Zierikzee was still loyal to Margaret. William obviously gave precedence to this threat, and started a
siege of Zierikzee. On 21 August 1351 he made a treaty with Zierikzee. If Margaret would not show up with an army before October 1, the city would submit to William. In case she did, the hostilities would continue. By early October 1351, William was indeed master of Zierikzee. The besiegers of Geertruidenberg Castle were led by
John IV, Lord of Arkel. All the Cod leaders and their henchmen joined the siege. These Cod leaders were:
John I, Lord of Egmond,
Gerard III van Heemskerk, Gerard van Herlaar, and Jan van der Noordeloos. They were joined by militia from Dordrecht, Haarlem, Delft, Leiden, and Geertruidenberg.
Siege and surrender Two dates are given for the start of the siege. Some say it started in October 1351. Others say it started in December 1351. Hunger forced Philips van Polanen to ask for a truce in mid 1352. William V then travelled to Geertruidenberg. On 22 July 1352, a temporary truce was made. Philips sent his envoy Philips van Tetrode to urge his Hook friends in Breda to send a relief force. In mid-August, the Hook party indeed sent a few hundred cavalry from Breda. These were led by
John of Polanen. On 17 August these returned to Brussels, apparently without any result. On 18 August 1352, Philips van Polanen surrendered Geertruidenberg Castle. Philips and his warriors were allowed to keep the goods they had before the war and were allowed a safe conduct to use them. Similar provisions were made for Philips van Tetrode, Willem van Foreest, Arend Nachtegaal, Wouter van Haarlem, Willem the bastard van Wassenaar, Gijsbrecht Hendrikszoon van de Lek, Philips van Beesd, and Gerrit the Bastard van Tetrode. == Aftermath ==