Sikandar Ka Muqaddar received mixed reviews from critics. Lachmi Deb Roy of
Firstpost awarded the film three and a half out of five stars, remarking, "Jimmy Shergill, Tamannaah Bhatia, Avinash Tiwary starrer heist thriller is unique to the core. The movie shines because of the plot and brilliant performances of each of the actors." She described it as a captivating thriller with intelligent twists, maintaining an engaging pace throughout its runtime and offering a clever, suspense-filled experience that ends on a cliffhanger.
Shubhra Gupta of
The Indian Express rated the film three out of five stars, stating, "Neeraj Pandey’s Netflix film is a rare beast in Bollywood, a pulpy character study with twists you don’t see coming." She highlighted that the film is driven by a strong ensemble cast and a plot that continues to surprise, despite its contrivances and occasional plot holes, and praised its focus on storytelling over star power, making it a refreshing OTT offering. Devesh Sharma of
Filmfare rated the film three out of five stars, describing it as "A Humane Thriller With Twists Aplenty." He noted that the film is a slow-burn thriller with standout performances by Jimmy Sheirgill and Avinash Tiwary, despite some loose ends, uneven pacing, and a far-fetched climax. Neeraj Pandey crafts a compelling narrative with shades of noir, making it an interesting watch for fans of the genre. Anuj Kumar of
The Hindu reviewed the film, stating, "Jimmy Shergill is on target in this ho-hum heist flick." He suggested that the film presents a compelling premise with a strong performance from Shergill but falls short due to excessive melodrama and predictable twists. While the film begins with promise, its slow pacing and lack of suspense lead to a missed opportunity, making it a superficial thriller stretched beyond its potential. Chirag Sehgal of
News18 awarded the film three and a half out of five stars, noting, "Avinash Tiwary Shines, Tamannaah Bhatia Has Little To Do In This Twisted Mystery." He pointed out that the film keeps viewers on edge with its surprising twists and compelling storytelling, although it underutilises its talented cast. While Avinash Tiwary excels, the film serves as a light, one-time watch, leaving room for a potential sequel. Archika Khurana of
The Times of India rated the film three out of five stars, writing, "Neeraj Pandey’s heist-thriller struggles to maintain tension, despite strong performances." She noted that the film starts with an intriguing diamond heist and showcases strong performances, particularly by Jimmy Shergill and Avinash Tiwary, with Tamannaah Bhatia adding emotional depth as a single mother. While visually striking with moments of brilliance, its sluggish pacing and predictable twists make it a one-time watch for fans of the genre. Rishabh Suri of
Hindustan Times reviewed the film, describing it as "Neeraj Pandey’s Tom and Jerry-esque thriller is decent, far from perfect." He pointed out that it offers a strong start with an intriguing heist and compelling performances. However, the film falters due to a shift in tone midway, slow pacing, melodrama, and a predictable twist, preventing it from fully delivering on its thriller potential. Sonil Dedhia from
Rediff.com rated the film two and a half out of five stars, calling it an "Underwhelming Thriller." He argued that it offers an intriguing premise and strong performances but struggles with uneven pacing and underdeveloped character arcs. While it has moments of suspense and moral ambiguity, the film fails to sustain tension, making it a one-time watch for fans of Neeraj Pandey’s work. Zinia Bandyopadhyay of
India Today awarded the film three out of five stars, commenting, "Runtime hampers the fate of Avinash Tiwary's drama." She noted that it offers a solid premise with strong performances, particularly from Avinash Tiwary and Jimmy Shergill, but falters due to its stretched runtime, uneven pacing, and underdeveloped screenplay. While it starts strong, the film ultimately becomes more of a melodrama than the gripping heist thriller it could have been, leaving hope for a more refined sequel. == See also ==