Situational ethics

Situational ethics is a form of consequentialism (though distinct from utilitarianism in that the latter's aim is "the greatest good for the greatest number") that focuses on creating the greatest amount of love. Situational ethics can also be classed under the ethical theory genre of "proportionalism" which says that "It is never right to go against a principle unless there is a proportionate reason which would justify it." J. A. T. Robinson, a situational ethicist, considered the approach to be a form of ethical relativism. There was an active debate in the mid-twentieth century around situational ethics, which was being promoted by a number of primarily Protestant theologians. The English term "situation ethics" was taken from the German Situationsethik. It is unclear who first coined the term either in German or in its English variant. ==Joseph Fletcher==

Fletcher proposed that in forming an ethical system based on love, he was best expressing the notion of "love thy neighbor," which Jesus Christ taught in the Gospels of the New Testament of the Bible. Through situational ethics, Fletcher was attempting to find a "middle road" between legalistic and antinomian ethics. Fletcher developed his theory of situational ethics in his books: The Classic Treatment and Situation Ethics. Situational ethics is thus a teleological or consequential theory, in that it is primarily concerned with the outcome or consequences of an action; the end. Fletcher proposed that loving ends justify any means. He abandoned his theistic belief in his later life but never strayed away from his belief in situation ethics. Fletcher outlined his theory in four "working principles" and six "fundamental principles". The four working principles The following are presuppositions Fletcher makes before setting out the situation(al) ethics theory: • Pragmatism: An action someone makes should be judged according to the love influenced in it, so the user must always ask: what is the most loving thing to do? For example, war may notto a situationistbe considered the most 'loving' thing and so many are quick to deem it as morally wrong. • Relativism: Approaching every situation with a relative mindset and thus opposing legalistic approachesavoid words such as 'never', 'complete' and 'perfect'. • Positivism: The most important choice of all in the teachings in 1 John 4:7–12 is "let us love one another because love is from God". • Personalism: Whereas the legalist thinks people should work to laws, the situational ethicist believes that laws benefit the people. This forces the user to ask 'who is to be helped?' instead of 'what is the law', stressing the importance of people before laws. The six fundamental principles (propositions) ; First proposition: Only one thing is intrinsically good; namely love: nothing else at all. Fletcher (1966, p. 56)an action is good only in so far as it brings about agape. ; Second proposition: The ruling norm of Christian decision is love: nothing else. Fletcher (1966, p. 69)the most important commandment is to love God and "love thy neighbour". ; Third proposition: Love and Justice are the same, for justice is love distributed, nothing else. Fletcher (1966, p. 87)asks that one must always have an eye on the intention of an action. :Justice is Christian love using its head, calculating its duties, obligations, opportunities, resources... Justice is love coping with situations where distribution is called for. Fletcher (1966, p. 95) ; Fourth proposition: Love wills the neighbour's good, whether we like him or not. Fletcher (1966, p. 103)illustrates that agape is not an emotion as it sometimes involves sacrifice, we must thus love not expecting anything in return. ; Fifth proposition: Only the end justifies the means, nothing else. Actions only acquire moral status as a means to an end; for Fletcher, the end must be the most loving result. When measuring a situation, one must consider the desired end, the means available, the motive for acting and the foreseeable consequences. Fletcher (1966, p. 120) thus, you must recognise that anything may be done if it brings about the most loving outcome. ; Sixth proposition: Love's decisions are made situationally, not prescriptively. Fletcher (1966, p. 134) - nothing is inherently right or wrong, everything should be done according to the most loving thing specific to the situation. Examples Fletcher proposed various examples of situations in which the established moral laws might need to be put on hold in order to achieve the greater amount of love. These were based upon real situations. Himself Might his Quietus Make Pragmatism, positivism, relativism and personalism are the four working principles which mean to be reasonably sure the act you take will work and provide the most loving consequence, accepting Situational Ethics as a matter of faith and not reason, each situation must be relative to love and bring about the most loving result and finally the needs of people come first rather than a set of rules. Special Bombing Mission No. 13 Christian Cloak and Dagger These situations were criticised as being extreme. Joseph Fletcher agreed that they were, as general guidelines should apply in normal cases, with exceptions for extreme cases. ==Criticism==

In his autobiography, philosopher Mortimer J. Adler characterized situation ethics as a "half-baked theory of conduct aired during the early sixties. It is morally wrong." Some have argued that it is not a true Christian ethic, as it ignores absolute moral commands in its emphasis on the concept of agape. ==See also==