The
Smolensk was ordered in 1899 and launched in 1901, ostensibly destined for use on a passenger service to the Far East. The name was assigned in recognition of a substantial contribution to Dobroflot funds from
Smolensk Governorate. But construction was overseen by a naval officer, Captain 2nd Rank Pyotr Arkadievich Troyan, and when the ship arrived in Russia in 1902, it was used as a troopship in the
Black Sea.
Indian Ocean In 1904, the
Smolensk was reassigned, with other Dobroflot vessels, to tow the Imperial Navy torpedo boats
No. 221,
No. 222 and
No. 223 to their new base in the
Far East, but when the
Russo-Japanese War began, her role was changed. The ship thus sailed south on 22 June 1904 (5 July
New Style), with Captain Troyan in command, preceded by another Dobroflot ship, the
Petersburg. They were both ostensibly carrying a cargo of coal and coastal artillery to
Vladivostok, with the
Smolensk detaining three as carriers of military
contraband to Japan, the
Ardova,
Scandia and
Formosa, which were sent back under
prize crews, with orders to sail to
Libau in the
Baltic Sea. The
Smolensk, with her superior range, then turned south, cruising as far as
Port Elizabeth in
South Africa, though she only encountered one more ship, a small steamer which was simply searched and released. The cruise of the
Smolensk and her consort provoked particular alarm in Great Britain, as they were able to detain British merchant ships suspected of carrying military supplies for Japan, and the
Royal Navy had no ability to intervene. Above all, offence was taken at the capture by the
Petersburg of the prestigious
P&O liner SS
Malacca in mid-July. More formal objections were raised to the fact that the two raiders had begun their voyage as merchant ships and abruptly switched identities once they arrived in the
Indian Ocean. Behind the rhetoric, the raid had the effect of suspending sailings for Japan by the three leading British shipping firms and imposing prohibitive insurance premiums on freight, illustrating the ability of large
surface raiders to disrupt global trade for the first time since the age of sail. Political negotiations were initiated by the British government, as a result of which the captured ships were to be released, and the two cruisers were ordered home. The two ships sailed for the
Baltic, with some sources dating their arrival at
Libau to 30 September 1904 (13 October N.S.), On 3 November 1904 (16 November N.S.), the two ships sailed again to join the
Russian Pacific Fleet, sailing via the
Cape of Good Hope in company with the more powerful
protected cruisers
Oleg and
Izumrud and two
destroyers. On 12 May 1905 (25 May, New Style) the two raiders were detached with orders to escort a convoy of transports to
Shanghai and then conduct commerce-raiding on Japanese lines of communication in the
Yellow Sea, They thus appear to have avoided being present at the disastrous
Battle of Tsushima on 14–15 May 1905 (27-28 May N.S.). After departing Shanghai,
Rion captured two more prizes, the German steamship SS
Tetartos (2409 brt) and British steamship SS
Cilurnum (2123 brt) before arriving at Batavia (modern
Jakarta) on 14 June. The
Rion now set out to return home. Later that month, the ship rescued passengers and crew from a French vessel which had gone aground off the
Horn of Africa, and eventually arrived back at
Kronstadt in the
Baltic Sea on 18 July 1905 (31 July NS). In 1908 the ship reverted to military control and returned to the Black Sea, serving variously as a military transport, a depot ship and a training vessel, and spending some years simply out of service. In these years, the ship's name alternated depending on her role, being variously
Smolensk, or
Rion, or simply designated by a number. According to some sources, the ship was sold for scrap in
Marseille in 1922, and subsequently broken up in
Italy. the naval historian and theorist
Sir Julian Corbett condemned their activities, and referred to them as "the two notorious cruisers
Dnyepr and
Rion". Prime Minister
Balfour was more conciliatory, however, reminding the British Parliament that the raiders were simply enforcing the same accepted rules that the Royal Navy had rigorously applied to neutral shipping in her own wars for centuries. ==Notes==