The Monthly Film Bulletin wrote: "The direction, photography and editing of this film place it in a class by itself as an imaginative, and at the same time, strictly documentary, presentation of the island of Ceylon. Its very excellence would probably make it unsuitable for educational purposes except for senior forms of secondary schools and for adult education institutions. Film Societies will welcome it and it should prove widely popular at most cinemas."
Kine Weekly wrote: "Another interest feature which fully Iives up to the standard set by previous John Grierson productions. It gives a vivid idea of the beauty of the country, and also introduces native customs and traditions in a manner which keeps one thoroughly interested. ... The camera work is a notable highlight in the film. It is used imaginatively and with an eye all the time to artistic effect. There is, however, no straining after weird camera angles. The settings are so beautiful that they inspire a very definite longing to visit Ceylon." Writing for
The Spectator in 1935,
Graham Greene described the film as "an example to all directors of perfect construction and the perfect application of
montage", and noted that it "moves with the air of absolute certainty in its object and assurance in its method".
Variety wrote: "This thorough-going four-reel travelogue on Ceylon attempts to dig down deep and cinematically explain the country and its people in more thorough manner than customarily encountered in the usual and surface-skimming type of film. Unfortunately, it is just a shade too arty and the only spot for it is in that sort of the house. Had some of the hard-headed realistic
March of Time approach ben used, film would have come off much better. As it stands the fancy and at times fantastic treatment will largely mystify audiences. In view of the splendid camera work and some of the sequences, notably the native dancers and religious devotions to Buddha, pic should have been aimed at the general public. Effort to explain the economics and commerce of Ceylon badly muddled through extensive use of vague or bewildering symbolisms." ==References==