The accident was investigated by the
Federal Aviation Administration and the
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). On September 12, 2016, the NTSB reported their initial findings. Initial findings from the examination of the airplane include: • The left engine inlet separated from the engine during the flight. Debris from the engine inlet damaged the airplane fuselage, wing and
empennage. • A 5-inch by 16-inch hole was found in the left fuselage just above the left wing. • No fan blade or inlet material was found in the hole and the passenger interior compartment was not penetrated. • During the accident sequence, the airplane experienced a cabin de-pressurization. • The aircraft maintenance records are being reviewed. Initial findings from the engine examination include: • One fan blade separated from the fan disk during the accident flight. • The root of the separated fan blade remained in the fan hub; however, the remainder of the blade was not recovered. Initial findings from the metallurgical examination conducted in the NTSB Materials Laboratory include: • The fracture surface of the missing blade showed curving crack arrest lines consistent with fatigue crack growth. The fatigue crack region was 29 mm (1.14″) long and 5.5 mm (0.217″) deep. • The center of the fatigue origin area was about 53 mm (2.1″) aft of the forward face of the blade root. No surface or material anomalies were noted during an examination of the fatigue crack origin using scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy. • The blades are manufactured of a titanium alloy and the root contact face is coated with a copper-nickel-indium alloy. Future investigative work by the NTSB will include 3-D measurements of the contact areas of all the blades, a non-destructive examination of the blade surfaces for cracks, and a review of the engine maintenance records. Parties to the investigation include the
Federal Aviation Administration,
Southwest Airlines, the Southwest Airlines Pilots Association, and
CFM International, which is a joint venture between
GE Aviation (US) and
Safran Aircraft Engines (France). The
French Bureau of Investigation and Analysis for Civil Aviation Safety has also appointed an accredited representative who is supported by a technical advisor from Safran Aircraft Engines. On March 30, 2020, the NTSB determined the probable cause of the accident as follows: "A low-cycle fatigue crack in the dovetail of fan blade No. 23, which resulted in the fan blade separating in flight and impacting the fan case. This impact caused the fan blade to fracture into fragments that traveled farther than expected into the inlet, which compromised the structural integrity of the inlet and led to the in-flight separation of inlet components. A portion of the inlet struck the fuselage and created a hole, causing the cabin to depressurize." == See also ==