Initial plans and route dispute (1955–1961) , the originally planned terminus of what was initially intended to be an independant Spadina subway line By the end of 1955, city planners at
Metropolitan Toronto had begun studying a subway to be built as part of the Spadina Expressway project to provide an additional connection to the then-proposed
Bloor–Danforth line. As originally proposed, it would be a new line running along Christie Street as it approached Bloor Street, connecting with the Bloor–Danforth line at
Christie station. North of St. Clair, the route would enter the Cedarvale Ravine and join the
Spadina Expressway there. The connection to Bloor would be around east of its originally proposed location. At the time, construction was expected to be done in conjunction with the Spadina expressway. This revision was reversed by the TTC in March 1960 causing friction between the TTC and Metropolitan Toronto, which approved the Spadina route. The TTC argued the Christie route was
CA$3 million cheaper and avoided complications at the Y-junction between the Bloor and University lines. The TTC reversed its decision, initially that April and again in May, reinstating the Spadina line. The April meeting had been done in secret by three of the commissioners while Christie line supporter
Ford Brand was vacationing. Brand only heard of the meeting from a phone call by a reporter. This led to infighting between the TTC's commissioners as well as with Metropolitan Toronto. The issue of which riders would need to transfer and construction of the necessary Y interchange to interline Bloor–Danforth and Yonge–University service were the primary sources of disagreement. In late June 1960, Metropolitan Toronto Council voted to build the full Y-junction. The TTC continued to prefer the Spadina route over the Christie route despite Brand's continued protest.
Postponement (1961–1970) Since 1959, the Spadina line had been expected to be constructed following the completion of the Bloor–Danforth line. However, in 1962 Metropolitan Toronto Chair
William Allen proposed to extend the Bloor–Danforth line first, with a busway to occupy the median of the Spadina Expressway temporarily. This move was opposed by Metro Planning Commissioner Murray Jones, who noted the Yonge line was already nearing capacity. In 1962, Metropolitan Toronto's transportation committee recommended extensions of the Bloor–Danforth line be given priority despite the possibility of delaying the Spadina line and by 1964 the Bloor–Danforth extensions were to be built before the Spadina line. In 1964, there was again debate on which subway line would be built next. Being considered were the Spadina line, the Queen line, a line to
Weston, and
a northerly extension of the Yonge line. Supporters of the Spadina line stated the Yonge line would be overcrowded if its extension were built first. Despite this, in October 1965 Metropolitan Toronto voted in favour of extending the Yonge line first. Additionally, a long-term plan released by the TTC in 1966 called for the Queen line to be constructed first, which would potentially further delay the Spadina line. This led Allen to endorse the Christie route, which would again be voted down by the TTC in July 1968. In 1968, the TTC recommended the Spadina line be the first subway extension built once the Yonge extension is completed, which was then expected to be in 1972. At this point the line was expected to open in 1983, but Metro Toronto's 1969 decision to speed up construction of the Spadina Expressway caused the TTC to start looking for the $53 million required to build it, as the tax levy normally used for subway construction was being used for the Yonge extension. Metro Toronto Council considered delaying the section of the Yonge subway extension from Sheppard to Finch to build the Spadina line faster, but this was defeated by a 16–6 vote in August 1970.
Approval after cancellation of Spadina Expressway (1970–1973) , the TTC considered routing the line to
Bathurst station. In late 1969, construction work on the Spadina Expressway was halted while the Ontario government reviewed the project, which was
unpopular with area residents. The review ended with the June 1971 decision by Premier
Bill Davis and his cabinet to cancel the expressway but support the quick construction of the proposed subway along its route. In 1970, the Toronto Planning Board recommended another review of the subway route, this time proposing the line run down Vaughan Road and
Bathurst Street south of Eglinton. The Board did not believe the Spadina Expressway routing would be cheaper than a Bathurst route, which was the reason the TTC was supporting it at the time. Anti-expressway activist and author
Jane Jacobs also criticized the Spadina route and preferred a subway on Bathurst, believing a Spadina route would be more difficult for pedestrians to access leading to lower ridership. In October 1971 following the expressway's cancellation, Premier Davis announced the line would continue to follow the expressway's route. Metro Toronto Chair
Albert Campbell protested Davis' decision, believing Metro should decide the route. Metro had already formed a committee to determine which route would work best, which was expected to report on its findings within a month. The TTC did not want the route to change. The committee recommended a route just west of the Bathurst route despite determining it would cost $169 million and require 150 expropriations, compared to $141 million and fewer expropriations for the Spadina route without the expressway. The Spadina route was forecast to be the cheapest and quickest to build. The proposed Bathurst-area routings all went to St. George, and route alternatives continued to be considered in 1972. Early that year, Metro Toronto was sent 130 briefs recommending the Spadina route under the belief it would allow the Spadina Expressway to be built. While the routing was undecided, the TTC began design work on the section of the line north of Eglinton Avenue. The
City of Toronto strongly opposed the Spadina route, voting in favour of a route under Bathurst Street or Dufferin Street in March 1972. Metro Toronto's transportation committee supported the Bathurst route, but Metro again approved the Spadina route in a September 1972 council vote. It was estimated to cost $154 or 155 million and take four and a half years to complete. The Bathurst route was expected to cost $40 million more. The City of Toronto appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board then to the Ontario Cabinet calling the route a waste of money and arguing it would destroy the Cedarvale Ravine, but both also approved the Spadina route, respectively in May and August 1973.
Continued dispute with the City of Toronto (1974) 's northern exit In early 1974, residents of
The Annex asked the TTC to not build Lowther station, which was planned approximately 150 metres (500 feet) north of
Spadina station. The TTC studied it that spring and approved the station in May. In July 1974, the TTC admitted that Lowther station would possibly be the terminus of the line and require passengers to transfer to the Bloor–Danforth line to go downtown. However, the TTC was not planning this and would only do it if passenger volumes warranted it. Additionally, an underground pedestrian connection with Spadina station via a
moving sidewalk would allow some riders to avoid transferring at St. George. Lowther was planned to be built north of Spadina to allow trains to turn into St. George station, but the TTC did not believe St. George would have the required capacity for another line. Lowther could also be used to turn trains back in case of an emergency. Toronto City Council reacted angrily, stating the station would harm The Annex and passing a motion for the TTC to study not building Lowther station despite such a study likely delaying the line by up to a year. Metropolitan Toronto's Executive Committee asked the TTC to consider not building Lowther but the TTC refused due to the potential delay and increased costs. A week later, the TTC persuaded Metro Toronto to stop opposing the station. ==Design==