Purple frog

Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis was described specimens collected in the Idukki district of Kerala by S.D. Biju from the Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute in Palode, India, from the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (Free University of Brussels), in 2003. However, it was already well known to the local people and several earlier documented specimens and publications had been ignored by the authors in the 2003 paper that describes the genus and species. Its closest living relatives are considered to be frogs of the family Sooglossidae, only known in the Seychelles, an island chain in the Indian Ocean. ==Etymology==

The scientific name Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis is a Latinized portmanteau of the Sanskrit () for "nose", Greek () for "frog", and Sahyadri, the native name for the Western Ghats which forms the purple frog's natural habitat. One of its common names, the purple pig-nosed frog, also makes reference to the elongated morphology of its snout, which is well adapted to the acquisition of fossorial termites. ==Description==

The body of Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis appears robust and bloated and is relatively rounded compared to other more dorsoventrally flattened frogs. Its flattened body assists it to cling to submerged rocks and boulders which essentially helps it to fight strong currents, allowing it to remain near stream banks where it typically lives. Its arms and legs splay out in the standard anuran body form. Compared to other frogs, N. sahyadrensis has a small head and an unusual pointed snout. Adults are typically dark purplish-grey in color. Males are about a third of the length of females. The specimen from which the species was originally described was long from the tip of the snout to the vent. Tadpoles of the species had been described in 1917 by Nelson Annandale and C. R. Narayan Rao as having oral suckers that allowed them to live in torrential streams. Suckers are also present in rheophilic fishes of genera such as Glyptothorax, Travancoria, Homaloptera, and Bhavania, adaptations that are the result of convergent evolution. Some of these fishes co-occur with Nasikabatrachus tadpoles in the hill streams. Its vocalization is a drawn-out harsh call that sounds similar to a chicken clucking. Males of this species exhibit the unique behavior of calling from under a thin layer of soil. Some other burrowing frogs (Myobatrachus gouldii and Arenophyrne rotunda) are known to do this, but these frogs have also been observed to call from the surface, while N. sahyadrensis has not. N. sahyadrensis may switch to headfirst burrowing due to its wedge-shaped skull and other-shaped limbs. ==Geographic range==

Earlier thought to be restricted to the south of the Palghat Gap in the Western Ghats, additional records have extended the known range of Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis farther north of the gap. The species is now known to be quite widely distributed in the Western Ghats, ranging from the Camel's Hump Hill Range in the north, all the way to the northernmost portions of the Agasthyamalai Hill Range in the south. ==Ecology==

Like many frogs, the Indian purple frog is well-adapted to its subterranean environment. The frog spends most of its life underground and surfaces only during the monsoon, for a period of two weeks, for mating. With few field scientists out in the field during the rainy season, the species was discovered and studied only in recent times. Males emerge to call beside temporary rainwater streams. They mount females and grip them (amplexus) along the vertebral column. The females then carry the male frogs on their backs to the egg laying sites which are usually crevices along the fast-flowing streams. Around 3,000 eggs are laid and fertilized in a rock pool, and the tadpoles metamorphose after around 100 days. In 2015, tadpoles of the species were discovered to be traditionally consumed by tribal communities. The major threat to this amphibian in the Western Ghats of India is caused by the alteration of natural habitats by an ever-increasing human population, resulting in large areas being converted for settlement and agricultural use. Recent studies have shown frog utilization to be one of the major threats, which includes the utilization of frogs for food and traditional medicine such as a cure for burns, asthma, and other lung ailments. Due to a lack of data, the remaining amphibians are mostly unresearched with no knowledge of ecology, biology, defining characteristics, and threats faced. ==References==