Due to the small size of the imaged animals (a mouse is about 3000 times smaller than a human measured by weight and volume), it is essential to have a high spatial resolution and detection efficiency for the preclinical scanner.
Spatial resolution Looking at spatial resolution first, if we want to see the same level of details relatively to e.g. the size of the organs in a mouse as we can see in a human, the spatial resolution of clinical SPECT needs to be improved by a factor of \sqrt[3]{3000} \approx 15 or higher. Such an obstacle forced scientists to look for a new imaging approach for preclinical SPECT that was found in exploiting the pinhole imaging principle. A
pinhole collimator consists of a piece of dense material containing only a single hole, which typically has the shape of a double cone. First attempts to obtain SPECT images of rodents with a high resolution were based on use of pinhole collimators attached to convectional gamma cameras. In such a way, by placing the object (e.g.
rodent) close to the aperture of the pinhole, one can reach a high
magnification of its projection on the detector surface and effectively compensate for the limited intrinsic resolution of the detector. The combined effects of the finite aperture size and the limited intrinsic resolution are described by: R= \sqrt{ { \left ({d_e \over M} \right ) ^2} + { \left ({R_i \over M} \right ) ^2}} de - effective pinhole diameter, Ri - intrinsic resolution of the detector, M – projection magnification factor. The resolution of a SPECT system based on the pinhole imaging principle can be improved in one of three ways: • by decreasing the effective diameter of the pinhole • by increasing the magnification factor • by using detectors with higher intrinsic resolution The exact size, shape and material of the pinhole are important to obtain good imaging characteristics and is a subject of collimator design optimization studies via e.g. use of
Monte Carlo simulations. Modern preclinical SPECT scanners based on pinhole imaging can reach up to 0.25 mm spatial or 0.015 μL volumetric resolution for
in vivo mouse imaging.
Detection efficiency The detection efficiency or sensitivity of a preclinical pinhole SPECT system is determined by: S = {{N {d_e}^2} \over {{16r_c}^2}} S – detection efficiency (sensitivity), de-effective pinhole diameter with penetration, N – total number of pinholes, rc – collimator radius (e.g. object-to-pinhole distance). The sensitivity can be improved by: • increasing the pinhole diameter Possible drawbacks: degradation of spatial resolution • decreasing the object-to-pinhole distance (e.g. placing the animal as close as possible to the pinhole aperture) • using multiple pinholes that simultaneously capture projections from multiple angles Possible drawbacks: When multiple pinhole projections are projected on a single detector surface, they can either overlap each other (multiplexing projections) or be fully separated (non-overlapping projections). Although pinhole collimators with multiplexing projections allow reaching a higher sensitivity (by allowing to use a higher number of pinholes) when compared to non-overlapping designs, they also suffer from multiple artifacts in reconstructed SPECT images. The artifacts are cause by ambiguity about the origin of γ -photons detected in the areas of the overlap. • decreasing the size of the "
field-of-view" Placing the animal close to the pinhole aperture comes at the cost of reducing the size of the area that can be imaged at a given time (the "field-of-view") compared to imaging at a lower magnification. However, when combined with moving the animal (the so-called "scanning-focus method" ) a larger area of interest can still be imaged with a good resolution and sensitivity. The typical detection efficiency of preclinical SPECT scanner lies within a 0.1-0.2% (1000-2000 cps/MBq) range, which is more than tenfold higher than the average sensitivity of clinical scanners. At the same time, dedicated high-sensitivity collimators can allow >1% detection efficiency and maintain sub-mm image resolution.
System design Multiple pinhole SPECT system designs have been proposed, including rotating gamma camera, stationary detector but rotating collimator, or completely stationary camera in which a large number of pinholes surround the animal and simultaneously acquire projections from a sufficient number of angles for tomographic image reconstruction. Stationary systems have several advantages over non-stationary systems: • no need for repetitive system geometry recalibration Why: due to the stable position of the detector(s) and the collimator • unlike non-stationary systems, stationary systems are very well suited for dynamic SPECT imaging Why: because all required angular information is acquired simultaneously by multiple pinholes. Modern stationary preclinical SPECT systems can perform dynamic SPECT imaging with up to 15s time-frames during total body ) is not uncommon. == Reconstruction ==