Gorman claims that the Spirit Cave included remains of Prunus (almond), Terminalia, Areca (betel), Vicia (broadbean) or Phaseolus, Pisum (pea) or
Raphia lagenaria (bottle gourd), Trapa (Chinese water chestnut), Piper (pepper), Madhuca (butternut), Canarium, Aleurites (candle nut), and Cucumis (a cucumber type) in layers dating to around 9,800 to 8,500 years BCE. None of the recovered specimens differed from their wild
phenotypes. He suggested that these may have been used as foods,
condiments,
stimulants, for lighting and that the
leguminous plants in particular "point to a very early use of
domesticated plants". He later wrote that "Whether they are definitely early cultigens remains to be established... What is important, and what we can say definitely, is that the remains indicate the early, quite sophisticated use of particular species which are still culturally important in Southeast Asia". In 1972 W.G. Solheim, as the director of the project of which Spirit Cave was part, published an article in
Scientific American discussing the finds from Spirit Cave. While Solheim noted that the specimens may "merely be wild species gathered from the surrounding countryside", he claimed that the inhabitants at Spirit Cave had "an advanced knowledge of
horticulture". Solheim's
chronological chart suggests that "incipient
agriculture" began about 20,000 years BCE in Southeast Asia. He also suggests that ceramic technology was invented at 13,000 years BCE although Spirit Cave does not have ceramics evident until after 6,800 years BCE. This conclusion was widely repeated in academic textbooks. Solheim himself admitted that his reconstruction is "largely
hypothetical." Higham and Thosarat conclude that there are "no grounds" for linking the site with agriculture. Elsewhere, Higham states that these claims have detracted from the significance of Spirit Cave as a site with well-preserved evidence of human
subsistence and palaeoenvironmental conditions during the Hoabinhian. == Lithics ==