Spondyloarthritis is primarily diagnosed, or at least first suspected, based on clinical factors. According to the current criteria for
ankylosing spondylitis, a person must exhibit clinical symptoms of inflammatory
back pain and limited spinal mobility together with radiological
sacroiliitis. But many people with inflammatory back pain may have no radiographic evidence of
sacroiliitis since up to 10 years might pass between the onset of inflammatory back pain and the development of radiographic sacroiliitis. Criteria for the early diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis have been developed in light of the emergence of effective treatments. These criteria consider the added value of
HLA-B27 testing, as well as current advancements in
MRI scanning. images of
sacroiliac joints:
psoriatic arthritis. Shown are T1-weighted semi-coronal magnetic resonance images through the sacroiliac joints (a) before and (b) after intravenous contrast injection. Enhancement is seen at the right sacroiliac joint (arrow), indicating active
sacroiliitis. Imaging is crucial to the spondyloarthritis diagnosis process. The most distinctive radiographic observation is the
sacroiliac (SI) joints' erosion,
ankylosis, and
sclerosis. There must be clear evidence of
sacroiliitis (at least grade 2 bilaterally or grade 3 unilaterally) on the radiographs to diagnose
ankylosing spondylitis. When axial spondyloarthritis is suspected,
sacroiliac joint radiographs are still the initial imaging approach. If radiographs clearly show
sacroiliitis, then no more diagnostic imaging is required. But because structural change seen on
radiographs can take months or years to emerge, normal radiographs or worrisome abnormalities only warrant additional diagnostic imaging in the context of suggestive clinical symptoms or findings. Furthermore, reading
sacroiliac joint radiographs can be difficult and dependent on several variables, such as the image quality, the radiological technique, the reader's background, and variations in sacroiliac anatomy. A challenge associated with radiographic imaging is the typical ten-year lag between the beginning of inflammatory
back pain and the development of radiographic
sacroiliitis. The only imaging modality that can precisely identify and evaluate spinal inflammation at this time is
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac joints and spine. It is also being developed as a gauge of disease activity and response to treatment.
Axial spondyloarthritis A person must meet two requirements to be considered for a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis: they must be under 45 years old and have experienced
back pain of any kind for at least three months. • Onset at <40 years old. • Insidious onset. • Improved with exercise. • Not improved by rest. • Pain at night. •
Arthritis. • Heel
enthesitis. •
Uveitis. •
Dactylitis. •
Psoriasis. •
Inflammatory bowel disease. • Good response to
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (
NSAIDs). • Family history of spondyloarthritis. • Elevated
C-reactive protein (CRP).
Peripheral spondyloarthritis The initial requirement is that a person have at least one of the following three findings: •
Arthritis. •
Enthesitis. •
Dactylitis. If the person meets the previous requirements, they must exhibit at least one of Group A's spondyloarthritis features or two of Group B's spondyloarthritis features. Group A spondyloarthritis features: •
Uveitis. •
Psoriasis. •
Inflammatory bowel disease. • Preceding infection. •
HLA-B27. •
Sacroiliitis on imaging. Group B spondyloarthritis features: •
Arthritis. •
Enthesitis. •
Dactylitis. • Inflammatory
back pain in the past. • Family history of spondyloarthritis. == Treatment ==