Oratio Panegyrica The
Oratio Panegyrica in honour of
Origen describes in detail that master's pedagogical methods. Its literary value consists less in its style than in its novelty: it is the first attempt at biography in Christian literature. This youthful work is full of enthusiasm and genuine talent; moreover, it proves how fully Origen had won the admiration of his pupils, and how the training Gregory received influenced the remainder of a long and well spent life. Gregory tells us in this work (xiii) that under Origen he read the works of many philosophers, without restriction as to school, except that of the atheists. From this reading of the old philosophers he learned to insist frequently on the unity of God; and his long experience of pagan or crudely Christian populations taught him how necessary this was. Traces of this insistence are to be met with in the Tractatus ad Theopompum, concerning the passability and impassibility of God; this work seems to belong to Gregory, though in its general arrangement it reminds us of Methodius. A similar trait was probably characteristic of the lost
Dialogus cum Aeliano (Pros Ailianon Dialexis), which we learn of through St. Basil, who frequently attests the orthodoxy of the Thaumaturgus (Ep. xxviii, 1, 2; cciv, 2; ccvii, 4) and even defends him against the Sabellians, who claimed him for their teaching and quoted as his formula: (that the Father and the Son were two in intelligence, but one in substance) from the aforesaid Dialogus cum Aeliano. St. Basil replied that Gregory was arguing against a pagan, and used the words , i.e. in the heat of combat, not in calm exposition; in this case he was insisting, and rightly, on the Divine unity. He added, moreover, that a like explanation must be given to the words (created, made) when applied to the Son, reference being to Christ Incarnate. Basil added that the text of the work was corrupt.
Epistola Canonica The
Epistola Canonica (Ἐπιστολὴ κανονική) (Routh,
Reliquiae Sacrae, III, 251–283) is valuable to both historians and canonists as evidence of the organization of the Church of Caesarea and the other Churches of Pontus under Gregory's influence, at a time when the invading Goths had begun to aggravate a situation made difficult enough by the imperial persecutions. We learn from this work how absorbing the episcopal charge was for a man of conscience and a strict sense of duty. Moreover, it helps us to understand how a man so well equipped mentally, and with the literary gifts of Gregory, has not left a greater number of works.
Exposition of the Faith The
Ἔκθεσις τῆς πίστεως (
Exposition of the Faith) is in its kind a theological document not less precious than the foregoing. It makes clear Gregory's orthodoxy regarding the Trinity. Its authenticity and date seem settled definitively, between 260 and 270. Caspari has shown that this confession of faith is a development of the premises laid down by Origen. Its conclusion leaves no room for doubt, "There is therefore nothing created, nothing greater or less (literally, nothing subject) in the Trinity (oute oun ktiston ti, he doulon en te triadi), nothing superadded, as though it had not existed before, but never been without the Son, nor the Son without the Spirit; and this same Trinity is immutable and unalterable forever". Such a formula, stating clearly the distinction between the Persons in the Trinity, and emphasizing the eternity, equality, immortality, and perfection, not only of the Father, but of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, proclaims a marked advance on the theories of Origen.
Epistola ad Philagrium The
Epistola ad Philagrium has reached us in a
Syriac version. It treats of the
Consubstantiality of the Son and has also been attributed to Gregory of Nazianzus (Ep. ccxliii; formerly Orat. xiv);
Tillemont and the
Benedictines, however, deny this because it offers no expression suggestive of the
Arian controversy. Draeseke, nevertheless, calls attention to numerous views and expressions in this treatise that recall the writings of Gregory of Nazianzus.
Other attributed works A
Metaphrasis eis ton Ekklesiasten tou Solomontos, or paraphrase of
Ecclesiastes, is attributed to him by some manuscripts; others ascribe it to
Gregory of Nazianzus;
St. Jerome (
De vir. illust., chapter 65, and Com. in eccles., iv) ascribes it to our Gregory. The brief Treatise on the Soul addressed to one Tatian, in favour of which may be cited the testimony of
Nicholas of Methone (probably from
Procopius of Gaza), is now claimed for Gregory. The or Twelve Chapters on Faith do not seem to be the work of Gregory. According to Caspari, the
Kata meros pistis or brief exposition of doctrine concerning the
Trinity and the
Incarnation, attributed to Gregory, was composed by
Apollinaris of Laodicea about 380, and circulated by his followers as a work of Gregory (
Otto Bardenhewer). Finally, the Greek, Syriac, and Armenian Catenæ contain fragments attributed more or less correctly to Gregory. The fragments of the De Resurrectione belong rather to
Pamphilus'
Apologia for Origen. == Patronage ==