Box office According to Fox records, the film required $10,675,000 in rentals to break even, and by 11 December 1970, had made $2,125,000. In September 1970, the studio reported a loss of $5,201,000 on the film.
Critical reaction Vincent Canby of
The New York Times wrote: "Although Burton and Harrison are interesting actors whose styles command attention even when the material does not, 'Staircase' is essentially a stunt movie ... Unlike Harry and Charlie, who eventually come to edgy terms with the emptiness of their lives, I couldn't quite come to terms with the emptiness of the movie.". Roger Ebert gave the film 1 star out 4, calling it "an unpleasant exercise in bad taste...[Donen] gives us no warmth, humor or even the dregs of understanding. He exploits the improbable team of Rex Harrison and Richard Burton as a sideshow attraction."
Gene Siskel of the
Chicago Tribune gave it 3 stars out of 4, calling it "a satisfactory film achievement with a very good story. Richard Burton is marvelous in holding up
Staircase. Rex Harrison is more of a broken step...[he] swishes and preens too much but controls the part as the movie progresses."
Stanley Kauffmann of
The New Republic wrote: "Staircase is a flabby film that, as it goes along, seems to realize its flabbiness and grabs frantically at bits of sordidness to prove that it really is serious.."
Charles Champlin of the
Los Angeles Times wrote: "We cannot will ourselves to forget that these are Harrison and Burton playing at being homosexuals. These are performances and even if they are good (as they are) and for the most part quite restrained (as they are), we still look at the craft and not into the tortured soul." Gary Arnold of
The Washington Post wrote: "Artistically, the depressing thing about 'Staircase' is that it has no surprises. We see everything coming a few beats or lines or minutes before the filmmakers and the stars, deliberately planting the clues and laying the groundwork and working up the old momentum, finally throw their best punches."
Penelope Gilliatt of
The New Yorker wrote: "Written by someone else and directed by a man more fond, it could have been a love story, and it could have been wonderful. Instead of that, it comes out like some total-immersion course in Camp banter, conceived in a way that keeps signalling the heroes' freakishness. The lack of affection for them makes the film depressing ... Only Burton's acting runs deep and true and comic."
Nigel Andrews of
The Monthly Film Bulletin wrote: "It is the air of unreality over the film that makes it finally so unsatisfying—the desultory studio street, the barber's shop permanently empty of customers, the sheer improbability of some of the acting (notably Beatrix Lehmann's grotesque cameo as Charlie's mother). If one were charitable, one could regard the whole thing as a vehicle, an opportunity for Harrison and Burton to show their paces in extravagant character roles ... Neither, however, can quite save the film from its inflated production values and the feeling that it has been cleaned up a little for popular consumption."
Leslie Halliwell said: "Unsatisfactorily opened-out and over-acted version of an effective two-hander play. Oddly made in France, so that the London detail seems all wrong." == Legacy ==